Literature DB >> 18689410

The role of infrequent and extraordinary deep dives in leatherback turtles (Dermochelys coriacea).

Jonathan D R Houghton1, Thomas K Doyle, John Davenport, Rory P Wilson, Graeme C Hays.   

Abstract

Infrequent and exceptional behaviours can provide insight into the ecology and physiology of a particular species. Here we examined extraordinarily deep (300-1250 m) and protracted (>1h) dives made by critically endangered leatherback turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) in the context of three previously suggested hypotheses: predator evasion, thermoregulation and exploration for gelatinous prey. Data were obtained via satellite relay data loggers attached to adult turtles at nesting beaches (N=11) and temperate foraging grounds (N=2), constituting a combined tracking period of 9.6 years (N=26,146 dives) and spanning the entire North Atlantic Ocean. Of the dives, 99.6% (N=26,051) were to depths <300 m with only 0.4% (N=95) extending to greater depths (subsequently termed ;deep dives'). Analysis suggested that deep dives: (1) were normally distributed around midday; (2) may exceed the inferred aerobic dive limit for the species; (3) displayed slow vertical descent rates and protracted durations; (4) were much deeper than the thermocline; and (5) occurred predominantly during transit, yet ceased once seasonal residence on foraging grounds began. These findings support the hypothesis that deep dives are periodically employed to survey the water column for diurnally descending gelatinous prey. If a suitable patch is encountered then the turtle may cease transit and remain within that area, waiting for prey to approach the surface at night. If unsuccessful, then migration may continue until a more suitable site is encountered. Additional studies using a meta-analytical approach are nonetheless recommended to further resolve this matter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18689410     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.020065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  6 in total

1.  How numbers of nesting sea turtles can be overestimated by nearly a factor of two.

Authors:  Nicole Esteban; Jeanne A Mortimer; Graeme C Hays
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Recursive filtering for zero offset correction of diving depth time series with GNU R package diveMove.

Authors:  Sebastián P Luque; Roland Fried
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Species-specific modulation of food-search behavior by respiration and chemosensation in Drosophila larvae.

Authors:  Daeyeon Kim; Mar Alvarez; Laura M Lechuga; Matthieu Louis
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Photo-ID and telemetry highlight a global whale shark hotspot in Palawan, Philippines.

Authors:  Gonzalo Araujo; Ariana Agustines; Brian Tracey; Sally Snow; Jessica Labaja; Alessandro Ponzo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Pan-atlantic analysis of the overlap of a highly migratory species, the leatherback turtle, with pelagic longline fisheries.

Authors:  S Fossette; M J Witt; P Miller; M A Nalovic; D Albareda; A P Almeida; A C Broderick; D Chacón-Chaverri; M S Coyne; A Domingo; S Eckert; D Evans; A Fallabrino; S Ferraroli; A Formia; B Giffoni; G C Hays; G Hughes; L Kelle; A Leslie; M López-Mendilaharsu; P Luschi; L Prosdocimi; S Rodriguez-Heredia; A Turny; S Verhage; B J Godley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Buried treasure-marine turtles do not 'disguise' or 'camouflage' their nests but avoid them and create a decoy trail.

Authors:  Thomas J Burns; Rory R Thomson; Rosemary A McLaren; Jack Rawlinson; Euan McMillan; Hannah Davidson; Malcolm W Kennedy
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 2.963

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.