Literature DB >> 18689056

Uncovering the requirements of cognitive work.

Emilie M Roth1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In this article, the author provides an overview of cognitive analysis methods and how they can be used to inform system analysis and design.
BACKGROUND: Human factors has seen a shift toward modeling and support of cognitively intensive work (e.g., military command and control, medical planning and decision making, supervisory control of automated systems). Cognitive task analysis and cognitive work analysis methods extend traditional task analysis techniques to uncover the knowledge and thought processes that underlie performance in cognitively complex settings.
METHODS: The author reviews the multidisciplinary roots of cognitive analysis and the variety of cognitive task analysis and cognitive work analysis methods that have emerged.
RESULTS: Cognitive analysis methods have been used successfully to guide system design, as well as development of function allocation, team structure, and training, so as to enhance performance and reduce the potential for error.
CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive characterization of cognitive work requires two mutually informing analyses: (a) examination of domain characteristics and constraints that define cognitive requirements and challenges and (b) examination of practitioner knowledge and strategies that underlie both expert and error-vulnerable performance. A variety of specific methods can be adapted to achieve these aims within the pragmatic constraints of particular projects. APPLICATION: Cognitive analysis methods can be used effectively to anticipate cognitive performance problems and specify ways to improve individual and team cognitive performance (be it through new forms of training, user interfaces, or decision aids).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18689056     DOI: 10.1518/001872008X288556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  7 in total

1.  Prevention and early recognition of necrotizing enterocolitis: a tale of 2 tools--eNEC and GutCheckNEC.

Authors:  Sheila M Gephart; Christine Wetzel; Brittany Krisman
Journal:  Adv Neonatal Care       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.968

Review 2.  Human factors and health information technology: current challenges and future directions.

Authors:  V L Patel; T G Kannampallil
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2014-08-15

3.  Understanding better how clinicians work.

Authors:  Rollin J Fairbanks; Ann M Bisantz
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.721

4.  Cognitive performance-altering effects of electronic medical records: An application of the human factors paradigm for patient safety.

Authors:  Richard J Holden
Journal:  Cogn Technol Work       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.372

Review 5.  Defining the methodological challenges and opportunities for an effective science of sociotechnical systems and safety.

Authors:  Patrick Waterson; Michelle M Robertson; Nancy J Cooke; Laura Militello; Emilie Roth; Neville A Stanton
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Telemedicine for Remote Surgical Guidance in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: Mixed Methods Study of Practitioner Attitudes.

Authors:  Hedvig Aminoff; Sebastiaan Meijer; Urban Arnelo; Susanne Frennert
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2021-01-11

7.  Task analysis method for procedural training curriculum development.

Authors:  Jakeb D Riggle; Michael C Wadman; Bernadette McCrory; Bethany R Lowndes; Elizabeth A Heald; Patricia K Carstens; M Susan Hallbeck
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2014-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.