RATIONALE: Adenosine receptors are involved in cocaine and methamphetamine discrimination and exposure to caffeine can affect behavioral effects of nicotine in rats. OBJECTIVES: Here we investigated the relative involvement of adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptors in nicotine, cocaine, and methamphetamine discrimination, before and/or during chronic caffeine exposure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The nonselective adenosine receptor antagonist caffeine, the A(1)-receptor antagonist cyclopentyltheophylline (CPT), and the A(2A)-receptor antagonist MSX-3 were evaluated in rats trained to discriminate 0.4 mg/kg nicotine from saline under a fixed-ratio schedule of food delivery. Effects of adenosine receptor antagonists were then compared in rats discriminating nicotine, methamphetamine, or cocaine from saline during chronic caffeine exposure in their drinking water. RESULTS: Caffeine, CPT, and MSX-3 partially generalized to nicotine and shifted nicotine dose-response curves leftwards. During chronic caffeine exposure, however, all three ligands failed to generalize to nicotine and failed to shift nicotine dose-response curves. In previous experiments, CPT and MSX-3 partially generalized to methamphetamine and cocaine and shifted dose-response curves leftwards. In the present experiments, CPT neither generalized nor shifted dose-response curves for methamphetamine or cocaine during chronic caffeine exposure. However, MSX-3 partially generalized to both psychostimulants and shifted their dose-response curves leftwards. Caffeine partially generalized to cocaine, but not methamphetamine, and shifted both dose-response curves leftwards. CONCLUSIONS: Both adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptors are capable of modulating the discriminative-stimulus effects of nicotine. Chronic caffeine exposure produces complete tolerance to both A(1)- and A(2A)-mediated effects in nicotine-trained rats. In contrast, chronic caffeine exposure produces tolerance to adenosine A(1)-mediated, but not A(2A)-mediated, effects in methamphetamine- and cocaine-trained rats.
RATIONALE: Adenosine receptors are involved in cocaine and methamphetamine discrimination and exposure to caffeine can affect behavioral effects of nicotine in rats. OBJECTIVES: Here we investigated the relative involvement of adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptors in nicotine, cocaine, and methamphetamine discrimination, before and/or during chronic caffeine exposure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The nonselective adenosine receptor antagonist caffeine, the A(1)-receptor antagonist cyclopentyltheophylline (CPT), and the A(2A)-receptor antagonist MSX-3 were evaluated in rats trained to discriminate 0.4 mg/kg nicotine from saline under a fixed-ratio schedule of food delivery. Effects of adenosine receptor antagonists were then compared in rats discriminating nicotine, methamphetamine, or cocaine from saline during chronic caffeine exposure in their drinking water. RESULTS:Caffeine, CPT, and MSX-3 partially generalized to nicotine and shifted nicotine dose-response curves leftwards. During chronic caffeine exposure, however, all three ligands failed to generalize to nicotine and failed to shift nicotine dose-response curves. In previous experiments, CPT and MSX-3 partially generalized to methamphetamine and cocaine and shifted dose-response curves leftwards. In the present experiments, CPT neither generalized nor shifted dose-response curves for methamphetamine or cocaine during chronic caffeine exposure. However, MSX-3 partially generalized to both psychostimulants and shifted their dose-response curves leftwards. Caffeine partially generalized to cocaine, but not methamphetamine, and shifted both dose-response curves leftwards. CONCLUSIONS: Both adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptors are capable of modulating the discriminative-stimulus effects of nicotine. Chronic caffeine exposure produces complete tolerance to both A(1)- and A(2A)-mediated effects in nicotine-trained rats. In contrast, chronic caffeine exposure produces tolerance to adenosine A(1)-mediated, but not A(2A)-mediated, effects in methamphetamine- and cocaine-trained rats.
Authors: Maciej Gasior; Maria Jaszyna; Patrik Munzar; Jeffrey M Witkin; Steven R Goldberg Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2002-06-07 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Vasco C Sousa; Natália Assaife-Lopes; Joaquim A Ribeiro; Judith A Pratt; Ros R Brett; Ana M Sebastião Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2010-10-06 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Bernard Le Foll; Munmun Chakraborty-Chatterjee; Shaul Lev-Ran; Chanel Barnes; Abhiram Pushparaj; Islam Gamaleddin; Yijin Yan; Maram Khaled; Steven R Goldberg Journal: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2011-09-23 Impact factor: 5.176
Authors: Gregory T Collins; Megan Abbott; Kayla Galindo; Elise L Rush; Kenner C Rice; Charles P France Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2016-08-04 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Patrick A Randall; Eric J Nunes; Simone L Janniere; Colin M Stopper; Andrew M Farrar; Thomas N Sager; Younis Baqi; Jörg Hockemeyer; Christa E Müller; John D Salamone Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2011-02-24 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Arthur L Brody; Robert Hubert; Michael S Mamoun; Ryutaro Enoki; Lizette Y Garcia; Paul Abraham; Paulina Young; Mark A Mandelkern Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 4.530