Literature DB >> 18688449

Chemcatcher and DGT passive sampling devices for regulatory monitoring of trace metals in surface water.

Ian J Allan1, Jesper Knutsson, Nathalie Guigues, Graham A Mills, Anne-Marie Fouillac, Richard Greenwood.   

Abstract

This work aimed to evaluate whether the performance of passive sampling devices in measuring time-weighted average (TWA) concentrations supports their application in regulatory monitoring of trace metals in surface waters, such as for the European Union's Water Framework Directive (WFD). The ability of the Chemcatcher and the diffusive gradient in thin film (DGT) device sampler to provide comparable TWA concentrations of Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn was tested through consecutive and overlapping deployments (7-28 days) in the River Meuse (The Netherlands). In order to evaluate the consistency of these TWA labile metal concentrations, these were assessed against total and filtered concentrations measured at relatively high frequencies by two teams using standard monitoring procedures, and metal species predicted by equilibrium speciation modeling using Visual MINTEQ. For Cd and Zn, the concentrations obtained with filtered water samples and the passive sampling devices were generally similar. The samplers consistently underestimated filtered concentrations of Cu and Ni, in agreement with their respective predicted speciation. For Pb, a small labile fraction was mainly responsible for low sampler accumulation and hence high measurement uncertainty. While only the high frequency of spot sampling procedures enabled the observation of higher Cd concentrations during the first 14 days, consecutive DGT deployments were able to detect it and provide a reasonable estimate of ambient concentrations. The range of concentrations measured by spot and passive sampling, for exposures up to 28 days, demonstrated that both modes of monitoring were equally reliable. Passive sampling provides information that cannot be obtained by a realistic spot sampling frequency and this may impact on the ability to detect trends and assess monitoring data against environmental quality standards when concentrations fluctuate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18688449     DOI: 10.1039/b802581a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Monit        ISSN: 1464-0325


  6 in total

1.  Preliminary investigation of polymer-based in situ passive samplers for mercury and methylmercury.

Authors:  Vivien F Taylor; Kate L Buckman; Robert M Burgess
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 7.086

2.  A multi-pronged approach to source attribution and apportionment of heavy metals in urban rivers.

Authors:  Priyanka Jamwal; Divya Nayak; Praveen Raje Urs; Mohamed Zuhail Thatey; Malavika Gopinath; Mohammad Idris; Sharachchandra Lele
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 6.943

3.  Estimation of Measurement Uncertainties for the DGT Passive Sampler Used for Determination of Copper in Water.

Authors:  Jesper Knutsson; Sebastien Rauch; Gregory M Morrison
Journal:  Int J Anal Chem       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 1.885

4.  Uncertainty evaluation of the diffusive gradients in thin films technique.

Authors:  Andreas Kreuzeder; Jakob Santner; Hao Zhang; Thomas Prohaska; Walter W Wenzel
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 5.  Passive sampling methods for contaminated sediments: state of the science for metals.

Authors:  Willie J G M Peijnenburg; Peter R Teasdale; Danny Reible; Julie Mondon; William W Bennett; Peter G C Campbell
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 2.992

6.  Bioaccumulation in aquatic systems: methodological approaches, monitoring and assessment.

Authors:  Sabine Schäfer; Georgia Buchmeier; Evelyn Claus; Lars Duester; Peter Heininger; Andrea Körner; Philipp Mayer; Albrecht Paschke; Caren Rauert; Georg Reifferscheid; Heinz Rüdel; Christian Schlechtriem; Christa Schröter-Kermani; Dieter Schudoma; Foppe Smedes; Dieter Steffen; Friederike Vietoris
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 5.893

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.