Literature DB >> 18688001

Higher risk factor burden and worse outcomes in urban carotid endarterectomy patients.

Seemant Chaturvedi1, Ramesh Madhavan, Sunitha Santhakumar, Maysaa Mehri-Basha, Nikita Raje.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Previous multicenter carotid endarterectomy (CEA) studies had screening criteria for patient comorbidities and very few blacks. We assessed the hypothesis that CEA results from two urban hospitals would approximate those of the previous multicenter trials.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was completed at two urban hospitals for CEA procedures done in 2003 and 2004. Demographic information and past medical history was recorded. In hospital perioperative complications (stroke or myocardial infarction [MI]) were noted. We calculated an expected perioperative stroke rate based on trial figures and our proportion of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.
RESULTS: Patients in our cohort had significantly higher rates of hypertension, diabetes, smoking, black race, and elderly status compared to previous trials. The expected perioperative stroke was 3.1%, and the observed stroke rate was 4.7% (P=0.36). Observed rates of MI (6.7%, P<0.001)) and stroke or MI (11.3%, P<0.0001) were higher than expected based on the previous trials. The stroke or MI rate in black subjects was higher (15.4% versus 5.6%, P=0.065) and this was significant at the hospital with lower CEA volume.
CONCLUSIONS: In two urban hospitals, CEA results were significantly worse than previous trials. Patient selection is likely to play a role because our cohort had higher numbers of hypertensives, diabetics, smokers, blacks, and elderly patients. Clinicians need to carefully consider the risk/benefit ratio of CEA in urban patients because our study shows that these patients have a large number of medical comorbidities and worse outcomes after CEA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18688001     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.516062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  10 in total

1.  Hospital resource use following carotid endarterectomy in 2006: analysis of the nationwide inpatient sample.

Authors:  Kate C Young; Babak S Jahromi; Michael J Singh; Karl A Illig; Curtis G Benesch
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 2.136

2.  Intensive medical therapy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Pratik Bhattacharya; Seemant Chaturvedi
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Disparities in vascular surgery: is it biology or environment?

Authors:  Louis L Nguyen; Antonia J Henry
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Comparing the use of diagnostic imaging and receipt of carotid endarterectomy in elderly black and white stroke patients.

Authors:  Kimberly D Martin; Lisa Naert; Larry B Goldstein; Stanislav Kasl; Annette M Molinaro; Judith H Lichtman
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 2.136

Review 5.  Asymptomatic carotid stenosis: immediate revascularization or watchful waiting?

Authors:  Sridhar Venkatachalam
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients with limited life expectancy.

Authors:  Jessica B Wallaert; Randall R De Martino; Samuel R G Finlayson; Daniel B Walsh; Matthew A Corriere; David H Stone; Jack L Cronenwett; Philip P Goodney
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Race as a predictor of delay from diagnosis to endarterectomy in clinically significant carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Eric S Wise; Travis R Ladner; Jun Song; Susan S Eagle; J Mocco; Justine E Wergin; Kyle M Hocking; Colleen M Brophy
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  Optimal selection of asymptomatic patients for carotid endarterectomy based on predicted 5-year survival.

Authors:  Jessica B Wallaert; Jack L Cronenwett; Daniel J Bertges; Andres Schanzer; Brian W Nolan; Randall De Martino; Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen; Philip P Goodney
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 9.  Management of Patients with Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis May Need to Be Individualized: A Multidisciplinary Call for Action.

Authors:  Kosmas I Paraskevas; Dimitri P Mikhailidis; Hediyeh Baradaran; Alun H Davies; Hans-Henning Eckstein; Gianluca Faggioli; Jose Fernandes E Fernandes; Ajay Gupta; Mateja K Jezovnik; Stavros K Kakkos; Niki Katsiki; M Eline Kooi; Gaetano Lanza; Christos D Liapis; Ian M Loftus; Antoine Millon; Andrew N Nicolaides; Pavel Poredos; Rodolfo Pini; Jean-Baptiste Ricco; Tatjana Rundek; Luca Saba; Francesco Spinelli; Francesco Stilo; Sherif Sultan; Clark J Zeebregts; Seemant Chaturvedi
Journal:  J Stroke       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 6.967

Review 10.  One swallow does not a summer make but many swallows do: accumulating clinical evidence for nearly-eliminated peri-procedural and 30-day complications with mesh-covered stents transforms the carotid revascularisation field.

Authors:  Piotr Musiałek; L Nelson Hopkins; Adnan H Siddiqui
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 1.426

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.