Literature DB >> 18687994

Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells express cardiac-specific markers, retain the stromal phenotype, and do not become functional cardiomyocytes in vitro.

Robert A Rose1, Huijie Jiang, Xinghua Wang, Simone Helke, James N Tsoporis, Nanling Gong, Stephanie C J Keating, Thomas G Parker, Peter H Backx, Armand Keating.   

Abstract

Although bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) may be beneficial in treating heart disease, their ability to transdifferentiate into functional cardiomyocytes remains unclear. Here, bone marrow-derived MSCs from adult female transgenic mice expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) under the control of the cardiac-specific alpha-myosin heavy chain promoter were cocultured with male rat embryonic cardiomyocytes (rCMs) for 5-15 days. After 5 days in coculture, 6.3% of MSCs became GFP(+) and stained positively for the sarcomeric proteins troponin I and alpha-actinin. The mRNA expression for selected cardiac-specific genes (atrial natriuretic factor, Nkx2.5, and alpha-cardiac actin) in MSCs peaked after 5 days in coculture and declined thereafter. Despite clear evidence for the expression of cardiac genes, GFP(+) MSCs did not generate action potentials or display ionic currents typical of cardiomyocytes, suggesting retention of a stromal cell phenotype. Detailed immunophenotyping of GFP(+) MSCs demonstrated expression of all antigens used to characterize MSCs, as well as the acquisition of additional markers of cardiomyocytes with the phenotype CD45(-)-CD34(+)-CD73(+)-CD105(+)-CD90(+)-CD44(+)-SDF1(+)-CD134L(+)-collagen type IV(+)-vimentin(+)-troponin T(+)-troponin I(+)-alpha-actinin(+)-connexin 43(+). Although cell fusion between rCMs and MSCs was detectable, the very low frequency (0.7%) could not account for the phenotype of the GFP(+) MSCs. In conclusion, we have identified an MSC population displaying plasticity toward the cardiomyocyte lineage while retaining mesenchymal stromal cell properties, including a nonexcitable electrophysiological phenotype. The demonstration of an MSC population coexpressing cardiac and stromal cell markers may explain conflicting results in the literature and indicates the need to better understand the effects of MSCs on myocardial injury. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18687994     DOI: 10.1634/stemcells.2008-0329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells        ISSN: 1066-5099            Impact factor:   6.277


  78 in total

1.  Mesenchymal stem cells or cardiac progenitors for cardiac repair? A comparative study.

Authors:  Remco Koninckx; Annick Daniëls; Severina Windmolders; Françoise Carlotti; Urbain Mees; Paul Steels; Jean-Luc Rummens; Marc Hendrikx; Karen Hensen
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 2.  Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells: historical overview and concepts.

Authors:  Pierre Charbord
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.695

3.  Low connexin channel-dependent intercellular communication in human adult hematopoietic progenitor/stem cells: probing mechanisms of autologous stem cell therapy.

Authors:  Jian Yang; Richard L Darley; Maurice Hallett; W Howard Evans
Journal:  Cell Commun Adhes       Date:  2009-12

4.  Bone marrow-derived human mesenchymal stem cells express cardiomyogenic proteins but do not exhibit functional cardiomyogenic differentiation potential.

Authors:  Georg Siegel; Petra Krause; Stefanie Wöhrle; Patrick Nowak; Miriam Ayturan; Torsten Kluba; Bernhard R Brehm; Birgid Neumeister; David Köhler; Peter Rosenberger; Lothar Just; Hinnak Northoff; Richard Schäfer
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.272

5.  Boot camp for mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Eduardo Marbán; Konstantinos Malliaras
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Scaffold-free and scaffold-assisted 3D culture enhances differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells.

Authors:  Prasanna Vidyasekar; Pavithra Shyamsunder; Sanjeeb Kumar Sahoo; Rama Shanker Verma
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 2.416

7.  Porous, Ventricular Extracellular Matrix-Derived Foams as a Platform for Cardiac Cell Culture.

Authors:  Valerio Russo; Ehsan Omidi; Abbas Samani; Andrew Hamilton; Lauren E Flynn
Journal:  Biores Open Access       Date:  2015-10-01

8.  Protective Effect of Intravitreal Administration of Exosomes Derived from Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Retinal Ischemia.

Authors:  Elad Moisseiev; Johnathon D Anderson; Sharon Oltjen; Mayank Goswami; Robert J Zawadzki; Jan A Nolta; Susanna S Park
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.424

9.  The mechanical coupling of adult marrow stromal stem cells during cardiac regeneration assessed in a 2-D co-culture model.

Authors:  Mani T Valarmathi; John W Fuseler; Richard L Goodwin; Jeffrey M Davis; Jay D Potts
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Donor mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) undergo variable cardiac reprogramming in vivo and predominantly co-express cardiac and stromal determinants after experimental acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Gustavo Yannarelli; James N Tsoporis; Jean-Francois Desjardins; Xing Hua Wang; Ali Pourdjabbar; Sowmya Viswanathan; Thomas G Parker; Armand Keating
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.