Literature DB >> 18687511

Illness representations and coping following an abnormal colorectal cancer screening result.

Sheina Orbell1, Ian O'Sullivan, Ron Parker, Bob Steele, Christine Campbell, David Weller.   

Abstract

Receipt of an abnormal screening test result is likely to activate an illness representation that guides emotional, cognitive and behavioural responses. The study investigates relationships between illness representations specified by self-regulation theory, and coping responses in people receiving abnormal faecal occult blood test (FOBT) screening results during the UK colorectal cancer screening pilot. After completion of all clinical investigations and treatment, men and women diagnosed with invasive cancer (N=196), adenoma (N=208), or no neoplasia (N=293) completed measures of illness representations, coping and state anxiety. Gender, socioeconomic status and diagnosis explained significant variance in different coping strategies while illness representations contributed between 5% and 21% additional explained variance. While identity, causal attributions and emotional representations explained variance in the use of avoidance and distancing, perceived personal control was important in explaining efforts to make health behavioural changes following an abnormal result. Relatively more use of escape-avoidance coping following a first abnormal screen was significantly associated with non-participation in screening 2 years later.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18687511     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.06.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  9 in total

1.  Health beliefs and illness perceptions as related to mammography uptake in randomly selected women in Greece.

Authors:  Fotios Anagnostopoulos; Christine Dimitrakaki; Deborah Fitzsimmons; Gregory Potamianos; Dimitris Niakas; Yannis Tountas
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2012-06

2.  Illness beliefs about cancer among healthy adults who have and have not lived with cancer patients.

Authors:  Antonio Del Castillo; Débora Godoy-Izquierdo; Ma Luisa Vázquez; Juan F Godoy
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2011-12

3.  Including limitations in news coverage of cancer research: effects of news hedging on fatalism, medical skepticism, patient trust, and backlash.

Authors:  Jakob D Jensen; Nick Carcioppolo; Andy J King; Jennifer K Bernat; LaShara Davis; Robert Yale; Jessica Smith
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2011-05

4.  Waiting for diagnostic colonoscopy: a qualitative exploration of screening participants' experiences in a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program.

Authors:  Pia Kirkegaard; Adrian Edwards; Mette Bach Larsen; Berit Andersen
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 2.711

5.  Persuasion, Adaptation, and Double Identity: Qualitative Study on the Psychological Impact of a Screen-Detected Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Lesley M McGregor; Sara Tookey; Rosalind Raine; Christian von Wagner; Georgia Black
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 2.260

6.  Using Mixed-Methods Research to Study Coping Strategies among Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Loai Abu Sharour; Omar Al Omari; Malakeh Z Malak; Ayman Bani Salameh; Dalal Yehia; Maha Subih; Mohammad Alrshoud
Journal:  Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2019-06-24

7.  Communication about colorectal cancer screening in Britain: public preferences for an expert recommendation.

Authors:  J Waller; A Macedo; C von Wagner; A E Simon; C Jones; V Hammersley; D Weller; J Wardle; C Campbell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  The clinical utility of a comprehensive psychosomatic assessment in the program for colorectal cancer prevention: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sara Gostoli; Maria Montecchiarini; Alessia Urgese; Francesco Ferrara; Anna Maria Polifemo; Liza Ceroni; Asia Gasparri; Chiara Rafanelli; Vincenzo Cennamo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Short and long-term psychosocial consequences of participating in a colorectal cancer screening programme: a matched longitudinal study.

Authors:  Jessica Malmqvist; Volkert Dirk Siersma; Mie Sara Hestbech; Christine Winther Bang; Dagný Rós Nicolaisdóttir; John Brodersen
Journal:  BMJ Evid Based Med       Date:  2021-06-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.