Literature DB >> 18687498

Evaluation of different methods for the detection and identification of Enterobacter sakazakii isolated from South African infant formula milks and the processing environment.

Donna-Mareè Cawthorn1, Sharon Botha, R Corli Witthuhn.   

Abstract

Enterobacter sakazakii is an emerging pathogen associated with life-threatening neonatal infections resulting from the consumption of contaminated powdered infant formula milk (IFM). Recent taxonomic analyses have determined that E. sakazakii comprises a number of genomospecies, and it has been proposed that E. sakazakii be reclassified as a novel genus, "Cronobacter". Accurate methods are required for the rapid detection and identification of this group of micro-organisms, since even low cell numbers have been reported to cause disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate various E. sakazakii detection methods in order to ascertain the most suitable method for detection and identification of these pathogenic agents. Samples from IFM and the environment were evaluated for the presence of E. sakazakii using the isolation steps (pre-enrichment, enrichment and selection) described in the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) method for E. sakazakii detection. Sixty-four isolates (50 from IFM and 14 from the environment) were selected from tryptone soy agar (TSA), regardless of colony appearance, and these isolates were identified by 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequencing. Thereafter, different culture-dependent and culture-independent methods were evaluated to accurately detect and identify the E. sakazakii isolates. These methods included the assessment of yellow pigment production on TSA, typical colonies on chromogenic Druggan-Forsythe-Iversen (DFI) and Chromocult Enterobacter sakazakii (CES) media and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using six different species-specific primer pairs described in the literature. Identification of E. sakazakii using yellow pigment production was demonstrated to have a low sensitivity, specificity and accuracy (87%, 71% and 74%, respectively), which lowers the suitability of the FDA method. Chromogenic DFI and CES media were sensitive, specific and accurate (100%, 98% and 98%, respectively) for the detection of E. sakazakii. The specificity of the PCR amplifications ranged from 8% to 92%, emphasising the need for rigorous primer testing against closely related species. Of the primer pairs evaluated, Esakf/Esakr were the most suitable for E. sakazakii detection and identification. The detection limit of Esakf/Esakr was found to be 10(4) CFU/ml. This study demonstrated that no single method was capable of unambiguously confirming the presence and identity of E. sakazakii isolates, that each method had inherent advantages and disadvantages, and that in most cases several methods were required for accurate detection and identification. Further, it was demonstrated that the current FDA method for E. sakazakii detection should be revised in the light of the availability of more sensitive, specific and accurate detection methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18687498     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.06.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0168-1605            Impact factor:   5.277


  10 in total

1.  Polymorphisms in rpoS and stress tolerance heterogeneity in natural isolates of Cronobacter sakazakii.

Authors:  Avelino Alvarez-Ordóñez; Máire Begley; Colin Hill
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Diversity of Cronobacter spp. isolates from the vegetables in the middle-east coastline of China.

Authors:  Wanyi Chen; Jielin Yang; Chunping You; Zhenmin Liu
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Identification and characterization of Cronobacter iron acquisition systems.

Authors:  C J Grim; M H Kothary; G Gopinath; K G Jarvis; J Jean-Gilles Beaubrun; M McClelland; B D Tall; A A Franco
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Phylogenetic analysis of Cronobacter isolates based on the rpoA and 16S rRNA genes.

Authors:  Amy Strydom; Michelle Cameron; R Corli Witthuhn
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 2.188

5.  Genes involved in yellow pigmentation of Cronobacter sakazakii ES5 and influence of pigmentation on persistence and growth under environmental stress.

Authors:  Sophia Johler; Roger Stephan; Isabel Hartmann; Kirsten A Kuehner; Angelika Lehner
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 6.  Cronobacter Species Contamination of Powdered Infant Formula and the Implications for Neonatal Health.

Authors:  Gautam Kalyantanda; Lyudmila Shumyak; Lennox Kenneth Archibald
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.418

7.  Stress tolerant virulent strains of Cronobacter sakazakii from food.

Authors:  Md Fakruddin; Mizanur Rahaman; Monzur Morshed Ahmed; Md Mahfuzul Hoque
Journal:  Biol Res       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 5.612

8.  Incidence, Etiology and Risk Factors for Travelers' Diarrhea during a Hospital Ship-Based Military Humanitarian Mission: Continuing Promise 2011.

Authors:  Jessica M Hameed; Ramona L McCaffrey; Andrea McCoy; Tracy Brannock; Gregory J Martin; William T Scouten; Krista Brooks; Shannon D Putnam; Mark S Riddle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Variability in Cell Response of Cronobacter sakazakii after Mild-Heat Treatments and Its Impact on Food Safety.

Authors:  Julio Parra-Flores; Vijay Juneja; Gonzalo Garcia de Fernando; Juan Aguirre
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Chemotaxis and Shorter O-Antigen Chain Length Contribute to the Strong Desiccation Tolerance of a Food-Isolated Cronobacter sakazakii Strain.

Authors:  Chengqian Qian; Min Huang; Yuhui Du; Jingjie Song; Huiqian Mu; Yi Wei; Si Zhang; Zhiqiu Yin; Chao Yuan; Bin Liu; Bin Liu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 5.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.