Literature DB >> 18687379

Behavioural differences between C57BL/6 and 129S6/SvEv strains are reinforced by environmental enrichment.

Urho Abramov1, Triinu Puussaar, Sirli Raud, Kaido Kurrikoff, Eero Vasar.   

Abstract

Housing in enriched environment has been advocated as a means for controlled variation of environmental conditions in transgenic studies to explore interactions between genes and surroundings. In the present study, behavioural phenotypes of C57Bl/6 (B6) and 129S6/SvEv (129) mice, housed in either standard laboratory conditions or environmentally enriched conditions, were explored. Housing in enriched conditions increased exploratory activity in the plus-maze and reduced habituation in the locomotor activity test in B6 mice, whereas in 129 mice increased hot plate latencies and reduced aggression were observed. Compared to B6, 129 strain displayed lower exploratory activity in the plus-maze and locomotor activity test, longer hot plate latencies, spent more time immobile in the forced swim test and engaged more in social interaction. These behavioural differences between the two strains were reproducible independent of pre-experimental housing conditions. Moreover, environmental enrichment accentuated dissimilarities between the strains in the plus-maze, locomotor activity, hot plate and forced swim test. By contrast, strain differences in anxiety-like behaviours in the plus-maze test and in aggressive encounters in the resident-intruder test were not reproducible in mice housed in alternative environmental conditions, suggesting a strong contribution of environmental factors to the development of these phenotypes. It is concluded that the application of environmental enrichment in addition to standard housing conditions is a meaningful approach for testing reproducibility of behavioural findings within one laboratory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18687379     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.07.075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  31 in total

Review 1.  Environmental enrichment of laboratory rodents: the answer depends on the question.

Authors:  Linda A Toth; Kevin Kregel; Lisa Leon; Timothy I Musch
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 0.982

2.  Environmental enrichment during rearing alters corticosterone levels, thymocyte numbers, and aggression in female BALB/c mice.

Authors:  Eric K Hutchinson; Anne C Avery; Sue Vandewoude
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.232

3.  Environmental enrichment exerts sex-specific effects on emotionality in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  En-Ju D Lin; Eugene Choi; Xianglan Liu; Adam Martin; Matthew J During
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Loss of the mu opioid receptor on different genetic backgrounds leads to increased bromodeoxyuridine labeling in the dentate gyrus only after repeated injection.

Authors:  T P Cominski; C E Turchin; M S Hsu; M A Ansonoff; J E Pintar
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 5.  Mouse model systems to study sex chromosome genes and behavior: relevance to humans.

Authors:  Kimberly H Cox; Paul J Bonthuis; Emilie F Rissman
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 8.606

6.  Developmental shifts in the behavioral phenotypes of inbred mice: the role of postnatal and juvenile social experiences.

Authors:  J P Curley; V Rock; A M Moynihan; P Bateson; E B Keverne; F A Champagne
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 2.805

7.  X-chromosome dosage affects male sexual behavior.

Authors:  Paul J Bonthuis; Kimberly H Cox; Emilie F Rissman
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 3.587

8.  Long-Term Provision of Environmental Resources Alters Behavior but not Physiology or Neuroanatomy of Male and Female BALB/c and C57BL/6 Mice.

Authors:  Amy E Clipperton-Allen; Joelle C Ingrao; Laura Ruggiero; Lucas Batista; Jelena Ovari; Jutta Hammermueller; John N Armstrong; Dorothee Bienzle; Elena Choleris; Patricia V Turner
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.232

9.  The clinical implications of mouse models of enhanced anxiety.

Authors:  Simone B Sartori; Rainer Landgraf; Nicolas Singewald
Journal:  Future Neurol       Date:  2011-07-01

10.  Not all mice are equal: welfare implications of behavioural habituation profiles in four 129 mouse substrains.

Authors:  Hetty Boleij; Amber R Salomons; Mariska van Sprundel; Saskia S Arndt; Frauke Ohl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.