Literature DB >> 18687288

The agreement chart as an alternative to the receiver-operating characteristic curve for diagnostic tests.

Shrikant I Bangdiwala1, Ana S Haedo, Marcela L Natal, Andrés Villaveces.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: For diagnostic tests, the most common graphical representation of the information is the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The "agreement chart" displays the information of two observers independently classifying the same n items into the same k categories, and can be used if one considers one of the "observers" as the diagnostic test and the other as the known outcome. This study compares the two charts and their ability to visually portray the various relevant summary statistics that assess how good a diagnostic test may be, such as sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: The geometric relationships displayed in the charts are first described. The relationship between the two graphical representations and various summary statistics is illustrated using data from three common epidemiologically relevant health issues: coronary heart disease, screening for breast cancer, and screening for tuberculosis.
RESULTS: Whereas the ROC curve incorporates information on sensitivity and specificity, the agreement chart includes information on the positive and negative predictive values of the diagnostic test.
CONCLUSION: The agreement chart should be considered as an alternative visual representation to the ROC for diagnostic tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18687288     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  6 in total

1.  Relationship between patients' outcomes and the changes in serum creatinine and urine output and RIFLE classification in a large critical care cohort database.

Authors:  Steve K Harris; Andrew J P Lewington; David A Harrison; Kathy M Rowan
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 10.612

2.  Antibody-Invertase Fusion Protein Enables Quantitative Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies Using Widely Available Glucometers.

Authors:  Elissa K Leonard; Miguel Aller Pellitero; Boris Juelg; Jamie B Spangler; Netzahualcóyotl Arroyo-Currás
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 16.383

3.  Interhemispheric sleep depth coherence predicts driving safety in sleep apnea.

Authors:  Ali Azarbarzin; Magdy Younes; Scott A Sands; Andrew Wellman; Susan Redline; Charles A Czeisler; Daniel J Gottlieb
Journal:  J Sleep Res       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 3.981

4.  Development of a High-Sensitivity Method for the Measurement of Human Nasal Aβ42, Tau, and Phosphorylated Tau.

Authors:  Ziyi Liu; Naoko Kameshima; Toshifumi Nanjo; Akihiko Shiino; Tomoko Kato; Shino Shimizu; Takeshi Shimizu; Sachiko Tanaka; Katsuyuki Miura; Ikuo Tooyama
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.472

5.  Genome wide DNA methylation profiling identifies specific epigenetic features in high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  David Hervás-Marín; Faatiemah Higgins; Onofre Sanmartín; Jose Antonio López-Guerrero; M Carmen Bañó; J Carlos Igual; Inma Quilis; Juan Sandoval
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Trauma Embolic Scoring System in military trauma: a sensitive predictor of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Patrick F Walker; Seth Schobel; Joseph D Caruso; Carlos J Rodriguez; Matthew J Bradley; Eric A Elster; John S Oh
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2019-12-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.