Literature DB >> 18687174

[The effect of different fluids on early fluid resuscitation in septic shock].

Feng Li1, Hua Sun, Xu-dong Han.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of different fluids on blood pressure (BP), blood lactate clearance and mortality in patients with septic shock after early fluid resuscitation.
METHODS: Sixty patients were enrolled and randomly divided into four groups according to the fluids used in resuscitation: normal saline (NS) group (15 cases), hydroxyethyl starch (HES) group (15 cases), 4% hypertonic saline solution (4%NaCl) group (15 cases), hypertonic sodium chloride hydroxyethyl starch 40 solution (HSH40) group, (15 cases). Patients of different groups received fluid resuscitation via central vein, at the same time, received the anti-shock treatment. Hemodynamic parameters, blood lactate clearance and mortality in patients were monitored after resuscitation.
RESULTS: The study fluid volume and the total fluid volume in the 4%NaCl group and HSH40 group was lower than that in NS group and HES group significantly (all P<0.01). The mean arterial pressure (MAP) in HSH40 group was significantly higher than in the other three groups 1 hour after the fluid resuscitation (all P<0.01). The 24-hour blood lactate clearance in HSH40 group was also higher than in the other three groups (all P<0.01). The scores of sepsis-related organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) scores, and 28-day mortality showed no significant differences among these groups (all P>0.05), but a lowering trend on 28-day mortality could be observed in HSH40 group.
CONCLUSION: The rapid elevation of BP can improve blood lactate clearance in patients with septic shock receiving early fluid resuscitation. Compared with other fluids, HSH40 raises BP more quickly and needs lower total resuscitation volume to achieve the same goal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18687174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue        ISSN: 1003-0603


  5 in total

Review 1.  Randomised trials of 6% tetrastarch (hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 or 0.42) for severe sepsis reporting mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amit Patel; Umeer Waheed; Stephen J Brett
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Choice of Fluid Therapy in the Initial Management of Sepsis, Severe Sepsis, and Septic Shock.

Authors:  Ronald Chang; John B Holcomb
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 3.  Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.38-0.45 versus crystalloid or albumin in patients with sepsis: systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Nicolai Haase; Anders Perner; Louise Inkeri Hennings; Martin Siegemund; Bo Lauridsen; Mik Wetterslev; Jørn Wetterslev
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-02-15

Review 4.  Normal saline for intravenous fluid therapy in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Fei-Hu Zhou; Chao Liu; Zhi Mao; Peng-Lin Ma
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2018-01-31

5.  Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Michael W Pritchard; David Jw Evans; Andrew R Butler; Phil Alderson; Andrew F Smith; Ian Roberts
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-08-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.