Literature DB >> 18687037

Assessment of posterior spinal cord function with electrical perception threshold in spinal cord injury.

John L K Kramer1, Alastair J Moss, Philippa Taylor, Armin Curt.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the relevant sensory spinal pathways involved in conveying conduction of electrical perceptual threshold (EPT). In 34 individuals with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) and eight healthy control subjects, combined EPT and electrical pain perception (EPP), and dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials (dSSEP) from cervical dermatomes were examined. Stimulation intensities for EPT were recorded to determine quantitative sensory perception and related neurophysiological dSSEP interpretation of posterior spinal cord conduction based on onset latency and waveform configuration. The preservation of EPP in dermatomes was examined relative to EPT to dissociate the involvement of the posterior (dorsal horn and ascending dorsal column) and anterior (decussating and ascending spinothalamic fibers) spinal cord according to different nerve fiber recruitment in the periphery. Pathological EPT values were significantly (p < 0.05) accurate at predicting pathological and abolished dSSEP recordings (>80%), and the mean EPT of pathological and abolished dSSEPs was significantly (p < 0.05) increased compared to non-affected and control dSSEPs. dSSEPs demonstrated normal early onset latency at perceptually low stimulation intensities (<2.5 mA), and selectively absent EPP was dissociated from preserved EPT and/or dSSEP in 22.2% of dermatomes with incomplete sensory deficit. The relationship between EPT and dSSEP interpretation, dSSEP early onset latency and perceptual stimulation intensity, and the dissociation of EPT from EPP suggests that EPT is conducted within the posterior spinal cord. The combination of EPT and EPP with dSSEPs provides reliable quantitative sensory information to assess the segmental integrity of the posterior and anterior spinal cord, and may improve the sensitivity to monitor changes in sensory function after SCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18687037     DOI: 10.1089/neu.2007.0503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  11 in total

1.  Diagnostic use of dermatomal somatosensory-evoked potentials in spinal disorders: Case series.

Authors:  Pinar Yalinay Dikmen; A Emre Oge
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 2.  Afferent input and sensory function after human spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Recep A Ozdemir; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Application of electrophysiological measures in spinal cord injury clinical trials: a narrative review.

Authors:  Michèle Hubli; John L K Kramer; Catherine R Jutzeler; Jan Rosner; Julio C Furlan; Keith E Tansey; Martin Schubert
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Changes in electrical perceptual threshold in the first 6 months following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jenny Luise Lauschke; Grace W S Leong; Sue B Rutkowski; Phil M E Waite
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  Age, gender, and side differences of cutaneous electrical perceptual threshold testing in an able-bodied population.

Authors:  Grace Woon Su Leong; Jenny Lauschke; Susan B Rutowski; Phil M Waite
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  The impact of sacral sensory sparing in motor complete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Steven Kirshblum; Amanda Botticello; Daniel P Lammertse; Ralph J Marino; Anthony E Chiodo; Amitabh Jha
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Time-Dependent Discrepancies between Assessments of Sensory Function after Incomplete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Richard A Macklin; Jihye Bae; Melanie Orell; Kim D Anderson; Peter H Ellaway; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 8.  Spinal cord injury: how can we improve the classification and quantification of its severity and prognosis?

Authors:  Vibhor Krishna; Hampton Andrews; Abhay Varma; Jacobo Mintzer; Mark S Kindy; James Guest
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 5.269

9.  A quantitative skin impedance test to diagnose spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Safak Sahir Karamehmetoglu; Mukden Ugur; Yunus Ziya Arslan; Deniz Palamar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Discrepancies between clinical assessments of sensory function and electrical perceptual thresholds after incomplete chronic cervical spinal cord injury.

Authors:  R A Macklin; V J Brooke; F J Calabro; P H Ellaway; M A Perez
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 2.772

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.