Literature DB >> 18687033

Prevalence and concentration of Campylobacter in rumen contents and feces in pasture and feedlot-fed cattle.

Nathan A Krueger1, Robin C Anderson, Wimberley K Krueger, Willy J Horne, Irene V Wesley, Todd R Callaway, Tom S Edrington, Gordon E Carstens, Roger B Harvey, David J Nisbet.   

Abstract

Campylobacter are important human foodborne pathogens known to colonize the gastrointestinal tract of cattle. The incidence of Campylobacter in cattle may be seasonal and may vary among age groups and type (beef versus dairy). Less is known about other factors that could influence the prevalence, colonization site, and shedding of Campylobacter in cattle. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the prevalence and enumerate Campylobacter at two sites along the digestive tract of beef and dairy type cattle consuming either grass or feedlot diets. In an initial study, Campylobacter was not recovered from rumen samples of any of 10 ruminally cannulated (six dairy and four beef type) pasture-reared cattle and there was no difference (p > 0.05) between cattle types on fecal Campylobacter recovery, with 50% of each type yielding culture-positive feces (overall mean +/- SE, 0.75 +/- 0.001 SEM log(10) colony-forming units [CFU]/g feces). When calculated from Campylobacter culture-positive animals only, mean fecal concentrations were 1.50 +/- 0.001 SEM log(10) CFU/g. In a follow-up study with feedlot and pasture-reared cattle (n = 18 head each), 78% of rumen and 94% of fecal samples from pastured cattle were positive for Campylobacter while 50% of the rumen and 72% of the fecal samples were positive in concentrate-fed animals. Overall mean concentration of Campylobacter was greater in feces than ruminal fluid (p < 0.05). When only Campylobacter-positive animals were analyzed, concentrations recovered from feces were higher (p < 0.05) in concentrate-fed than in pasture-fed cattle (4.29 vs. 3.34 log(10) CFU/g, respectively; SEM = 0.29). Our results suggest that the rumen environment and its microbial population are less favorable for the growth of Campylobacter and that concentrate diets may provide a more hospitable lower gastrointestinal tract for Campylobacter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18687033     DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2007.0059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis        ISSN: 1535-3141            Impact factor:   3.171


  5 in total

1.  Diversity and abundance of zoonotic pathogens and indicators in manures of feedlot cattle in Australia.

Authors:  Marcus Klein; Leearna Brown; Robyn W Tucker; Nicholas J Ashbolt; Richard M Stuetz; David J Roser
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Decreased competiveness of the foodborne pathogen Campylobacter jejuni during Co-culture with the hyper-ammonia producing anaerobe Clostridium aminophilum.

Authors:  R C Anderson; M D Flythe; N A Krueger; T R Callaway; T S Edrington; R B Harvey; D J Nisbet
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 2.099

Review 3.  Campylobacteriosis, Salmonellosis, Yersiniosis, and Listeriosis as Zoonotic Foodborne Diseases: A Review.

Authors:  Agnieszka Chlebicz; Katarzyna Śliżewska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Influence of Farming Conditions on the Rumen of Red Deer (Cervus elaphus).

Authors:  Federico Mason; Bartosz Fotschki; Alessia Di Rosso; Anna Korzekwa
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Wide but Variable Distribution of a Hypervirulent Campylobacter jejuni Clone in Beef and Dairy Cattle in the United States.

Authors:  Yizhi Tang; Richard J Meinersmann; Orhan Sahin; Zuowei Wu; Lei Dai; James Carlson; Jodie Plumblee Lawrence; Linda Genzlinger; Jeffrey T LeJeune; Qijing Zhang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.792

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.