Literature DB >> 18684801

Pregnancy outcome after exposure to oral contraceptives during the periconceptional period.

H K Ahn1, J S Choi, J Y Han, M H Kim, J H Chung, H M Ryu, M Y Kim, J H Yang, M K Koong, A A Nava-Ocampo, G Koren.   

Abstract

To evaluate whether periconceptional exposure to oral contraceptives (OCs) increased adverse pregnancy outcomes, 136 pregnant women taking OCs within the periconceptional period were identified at the Korean Motherisk Program. Of them, 120 pregnant women accepted to participate in their study and were followed up until completion of the pregnancy. A control group of 240 age- and gravidity-matched pregnant women exposed to non-teratogen drugs for at least 1 month before pregnancy was also included. The median gestational age at delivery was 39.1 (27.0-41.0) weeks in the exposed group and 39.3 (27.4-42.0) weeks in the control group (P = 0.19). In the exposed group, 7.1% of babies were born with low birth weight versus 2.6% in the control group (P = 0.068). The number of preterm deliveries or babies born large for gestational age did not differ between the two groups. In the exposed group, the rate of birth defects was 3.2% (n = 3/99) versus 3.6% (n = 7/193) in the control group (P = 1.0). There were 15 women who took high doses of progesterone (emergency contraception) and no adverse fetal outcomes were observed. In conclusion, periconceptional exposure to OCs does not appear to increase the risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18684801     DOI: 10.1177/0960327108092290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Exp Toxicol        ISSN: 0960-3271            Impact factor:   2.903


  7 in total

1.  Maternal hormonal contraceptive use and offspring overweight or obesity.

Authors:  E T Jensen; J L Daniels; T Stürmer; W R Robinson; C J Williams; D Moster; P B Juliusson; K Vejrup; P Magnus; M P Longnecker
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 5.095

2.  Hormonal contraceptive use before and after conception in relation to preterm birth and small for gestational age: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  E T Jensen; J L Daniels; T Stürmer; W R Robinson; C J Williams; K Vejrup; P Magnus; M P Longnecker
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 6.531

3.  Pre-gravid oral contraceptive use in relation to birth weight: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Hatch; Kristen A Hahn; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Anders H Riis; Henrik Toft Sorensen; Kenneth J Rothman; Lauren A Wise
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  Pilot test and validation of the peak day method of prospective determination of ovulation against a handheld urine hormone monitor.

Authors:  Christina A Porucznik; Kyley J Cox; Karen C Schliep; Joseph B Stanford
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 5.  Preconception care: screening and management of chronic disease and promoting psychological health.

Authors:  Zohra S Lassi; Ayesha M Imam; Sohni V Dean; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.223

Review 6.  Emergency contraception - potential for women's health.

Authors:  Suneeta Mittal
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 7.  Investigation of 7-dehydrocholesterol reductase pathway to elucidate off-target prenatal effects of pharmaceuticals: a systematic review.

Authors:  M R Boland; N P Tatonetti
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.550

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.