Literature DB >> 18684047

Refining the borderline personality disorder phenotype through finite mixture modeling: implications for classification.

Mark F Lenzenweger1, John F Clarkin, Frank E Yeomans, Otto F Kernberg, Kenneth N Levy.   

Abstract

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is characterized by considerable heterogeneity. Prior approaches to resolving heterogeneity in BPD pathology have used factor and cluster analytic as well as latent class analysis strategies. These prior studies have been atheoretical in nature, but provide an initial empirical corpus for further sub-typing efforts in BPD. A model-based taxonomy for BPD that is supported by evidence from an advanced statistical methodology would enhance investigations of BPD etiology, pathophysiology, and treatment. This study applied finite mixture modeling analysis, in a model-guided fashion, to selected dimensions of pathology within a group of well-characterized BPD patients to determine if latent groups are harbored within the disorder. Subjects with BPD (N = 90) were examined on a variety of model-relevant psychopathology dimensions. We applied finite mixture modeling to these dimensions. We then evaluated the validity of the obtained solution by reference to a variety of external measures not included in the initial mixture modeling. Three phenotypically distinct groups reside within the overall BPD category. Group-1 is characterized by low levels of antisocial, paranoid, and aggressive features. Group-2 is characterized by elevated paranoid features, whereas Group-3 is characterized by elevated antisocial and aggressive features. External correlates reveal a pattern of differences consistent with the validity of this proposed grouping structure. A theory-guided finite mixture modeling analysis supports a parsing of the BPD category into three subgroups. This proposed BPD taxonomy represents an approach to reducing heterogeneity observed among BPD patients and it may prove useful in studies seeking to understand etiologic and pathophysiologic factors as well as treatment response in BPD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18684047     DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2008.22.4.313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Disord        ISSN: 0885-579X


  20 in total

1.  Modeling stability and change in borderline personality disorder symptoms using the revised Interpersonal Adjective Scales-Big Five (IASR-B5).

Authors:  Aidan G C Wright; Aaron L Pincus; Mark F Lenzenweger
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  2010-11

2.  Personality Pathology and Interpersonal Problem Stability.

Authors:  Aidan G C Wright; Lori N Scott; Stephanie D Stepp; Michael N Hallquist; Paul A Pilkonis
Journal:  J Pers Disord       Date:  2015-01-06

3.  Refining the phenotype of borderline personality disorder: Diagnostic criteria and beyond.

Authors:  Michael N Hallquist; Paul A Pilkonis
Journal:  Personal Disord       Date:  2012-07

4.  The structure of borderline personality disorder symptoms: a multi-method, multi-sample examination.

Authors:  Ashley A Hawkins; R Michael Furr; Elizabeth Mayfield Arnold; Mary Kate Law; Malek Mneimne; William Fleeson
Journal:  Personal Disord       Date:  2014-10

5.  Stability and fluctuation of personality disorder features in daily life.

Authors:  Aidan G C Wright; Leonard J Simms
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2016-05-19

Review 6.  Heterogeneity and Subtyping in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder-Considerations for Emerging Research Using Person-Centered Computational Approaches.

Authors:  Sarah L Karalunas; Joel T Nigg
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 13.382

7.  The Brave New World of Personality Disorder-Trait Specified: Effects of Additional Definitions on Coverage, Prevalence, and Comorbidity.

Authors:  Lee Anna Clark; Emily N Vanderbleek; Jaime L Shapiro; Hallie Nuzum; Xia Allen; Elizabeth Daly; Thomas J Kingsbury; Morgan Oiler; Eunyoe Ro
Journal:  Psychopathol Rev       Date:  2015

8.  Population heterogeneity of trait anger and differential associations of trait anger facets with borderline personality features, neuroticism, depression, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), and alcohol problems.

Authors:  Gitta H Lubke; Klaasjan G Ouwens; Marleen H M de Moor; Timothy J Trull; Dorret I Boomsma
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 3.222

9.  Affective lability and difficulties with regulation are differentially associated with amygdala and prefrontal response in women with Borderline Personality Disorder.

Authors:  Jennifer A Silvers; Alexa D Hubbard; Emily Biggs; Jocelyn Shu; Eric Fertuck; Sadia Chaudhury; Michael F Grunebaum; Jochen Weber; Hedy Kober; Megan Chesin; Beth S Brodsky; Harold Koenigsberg; Kevin N Ochsner; Barbara Stanley
Journal:  Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 2.376

10.  Mixture modeling methods for the assessment of normal and abnormal personality, part I: cross-sectional models.

Authors:  Michael N Hallquist; Aidan G C Wright
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  2013-10-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.