Literature DB >> 18683872

Does the preoperative imaging of perforators with CT angiography improve operative outcomes in breast reconstruction?

Warren M Rozen1, Namrata S Anavekar, Mark W Ashton, Damien L Stella, Damien Grinsell, Richard J Bloom, G Ian Taylor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast reconstruction is increasingly performed with the use of the abdominal wall donor site, with potential complications including donor site morbidity and impaired flap viability. As a tool for selecting the optimal perforators which will ultimately supply the flap, preoperative imaging with computed tomography angiography (CTA) has become increasingly popular. Potential benefits include reduced intramuscular dissection, with faster and safer dissection, reduced donor site morbidity and improved flap vascularity and survival. Despite the potential for improvements in operative outcome, any benefits are yet to be established.
METHODS: A cohort study of 104 breast reconstructions in 88 patients was conducted. All patients underwent breast reconstruction based on an abdominal wall free flap. Of these, 40 patients undergoing preoperative imaging with CTA and 48 patients not undergoing CTA were included, with all CTAs undertaken at a single institution. Length of operation, length of stay, and operative complications were assessed. An evaluation of operative stress was achieved with the use of visual analogue scales (VAS) administered to the surgeons.
RESULTS: The use of CTA was associated with decreased operating time (mean: 77 min for bilateral cases), significantly decreased complications related to flap viability (particularly partial flap loss), and a statistically significant reduction in donor site morbidity. Psychometric testing of surgeons revealed a statistically significant decrease in operative stress (41% decrease) with the use of preoperative CTA.
CONCLUSION: The use of CTA for preoperative imaging in breast reconstruction is associated with improved operative outcomes. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18683872     DOI: 10.1002/micr.20526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microsurgery        ISSN: 0738-1085            Impact factor:   2.425


  35 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative imaging in the planning of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap surgery.

Authors:  Sébastien Aubry; Julien Pauchot; Adrian Kastler; Olivia Laurent; Yves Tropet; Michel Runge
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Current state of the art in perforator flap imaging with computed tomographic angiography.

Authors:  Warren Matthew Rozen; Diego Ribuffo; Matteo Atzeni; Damien L Stella; Luca Saba; Maristella Guerra; Damien Grinsell; Mark W Ashton
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Three-dimensional prediction of free-flap volume in autologous breast reconstruction by CT angiography imaging.

Authors:  Maximilian Eder; Stefan Raith; Jalil Jalali; Daniel Müller; Yves Harder; Martin Dobritz; Nikolaos A Papadopulos; Hans-Günther Machens; Laszlo Kovacs
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Clinical study of peroneal artery perforators with computed tomographic angiography: implications for fibular flap harvest.

Authors:  Diego Ribuffo; Matteo Atzeni; Luca Saba; Maristella Guerra; Giorgio Mallarini; Ernesto Biagio Proto; Damien Grinsell; Mark W Ashton; Warren M Rozen
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-09-12       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Comparative analysis of fluorescent angiography, computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for planning autologous breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael P Chae; David J Hunter-Smith; Warren Matthew Rozen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-04

Review 6.  Essential elements of the preoperative breast reconstruction evaluation.

Authors:  Angela Cheng; Albert Losken
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-04

Review 7.  A review of visualized preoperative imaging with a focus on surgical procedures of the breast.

Authors:  Bridget Rodkin; David J Hunter-Smith; Warren M Rozen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-10

8.  Planning deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps for breast reconstruction: a comparison between multidetector computed tomography and magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  A Cina; L Barone-Adesi; P Rinaldi; A Cipriani; M Salgarello; R Masetti; L Bonomo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Reducing radiation dose without compromising image quality in preoperative perforator flap imaging with CTA using ASIR technology.

Authors:  Vachara Niumsawatt; Andrew N Debrotwir; Warren Matthew Rozen
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug

10.  The evolving breast reconstruction: from latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap to a propeller thoracodorsal fasciocutaneous flap.

Authors:  Jørn Bo Thomsen; Gudjon Leifur Gunnarsson
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2014-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.