Literature DB >> 18683863

Sensory outcome of fingertip replantations without nerve repair.

Ismail Bulent Ozcelik1, Serdar Tuncer, Husrev Purisa, Ilker Sezer, Berkan Mersa, Fatih Kabakas, Pinar Celikdelen.   

Abstract

The sensory recovery outcomes of fingertip replantations without nerve repair were retrospectively studied. Between 2000 and 2006, 112 fingertip replantations with only arterial repair were carried out in 98 patients. About 76 of the replants survived totally, with a success rate of 67.8%. Evaluation of sensory recovery was possible in 31 patients (38 replantations). Sensory evaluation was made with Semmes-Weinstein, static and dynamic two-point discrimination, and vibration sense tests. Fingertip atrophy, nail deformities, and return to work were also evaluated. According to the Semmes-Weinstein test, 29.0% (11/38) of the fingers had normal sense, 60.5% (23/38) had diminished light touch, 7.9% (3/38) had diminished protective sensation, and 2.6% (1/38) had loss of protective sensation. Mean static and dynamic two-point discriminations were 7.2 mm (3-11 mm), and 4.60 mm (3-6 mm), respectively. Vibratory testing revealed increased vibration in 42.1% of the fingers, decreased vibration in 36.8%, and equal vibration when compared with the non-injured fingers in 21.1%. Atrophy was present in 14 (36.8%) fingers and negatively affected the results. Nail deformities, cold intolerance, return to work, and the effect of sensory education were investigated. Comparison of crush and clean cut injuries did not yield any significant difference in any of the parameters. Patients who received sensory education had significantly better results in sensory testing. The results were classified as excellent, good, and poor based on results of two-point discrimination tests. The outcome was excellent in 18 fingers and good in 20 fingers. Overall, satisfactory sensory recovery was achieved in fingertip replantations without nerve repair. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18683863     DOI: 10.1002/micr.20543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microsurgery        ISSN: 0738-1085            Impact factor:   2.425


  7 in total

1.  Challenges in measuring outcomes following digital replantation.

Authors:  Sandeep J Sebastin; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Challenges in fingertip replantation.

Authors:  Jin-Soo Kim; Jae-Won Yang; Dong-Chul Lee; Sae-Hwi Ki; Si-Young Roh
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 3.  A systematic review of the outcomes of replantation of distal digital amputation.

Authors:  Sandeep J Sebastin; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Fingertip replantation (zone I) without venous anastomosis: clinical experience and outcome analysis.

Authors:  An-Shi Huan; Subhash Regmi; Jia-Xiang Gu; Hong-Jun Liu; Wen-Zhong Zhang
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-10-21

5.  Mangled finger salvage using cross-finger revascularization.

Authors:  Song Chen; Gen Wen; Liang Cheng; Yimin Chai
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Reverse Flow Shunt Restricted Free Venous Flap for a Ring Avulsion Injury.

Authors:  Ahmed M Yassin; Constantinos Kokkinos; Mark Gorman; Sathyan Gnanalingham; Dariush Nikkhah
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-09-20

7.  Controlled continuous systemic heparinization increases success rate of artery-only anastomosis replantation in single distal digit amputation: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jun Yong Lee; Hak Soo Kim; Sang Taek Heo; Ho Kwon; Sung-No Jung
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.889

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.