| Literature DB >> 18682818 |
Romualda Bregier-Jarzebowska1, Anna Gasowska, Lechosław Lomozik.
Abstract
Interactions between aspartic acid (Entities:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18682818 PMCID: PMC2494589 DOI: 10.1155/2008/253971
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioinorg Chem Appl Impact factor: 7.778
Scheme 1Chemical formulae of the bioligands studied.
Overall stability constants (log β) and equilibrium constants (log K ) of adducts formation in Asp/CMP system.
| Species | log | log |
|---|---|---|
| H3Asp | 15.42 (3) | 2.06 |
| H2Asp | 13.36 (1) | 3.73 |
| HAsp | 9.63 (1) | 9.63 |
|
| ||
| H2CMP | 10.90 (1) [ | 4.47 |
| HCMP | 6.42 (2) [ | 6.42 |
|
| ||
| (Asp)H4(CMP) | 27.13 (4) | 2.87 |
| (Asp)H3(CMP) | 23.37 (3) | 2.84 |
| (Asp)H2(CMP) | 18.79 (3) | 2.74 |
| (Asp)H(CMP) | 12.01 (3) | 2.38 |
Figure 1Experimental and simulated titration curves for the Asp/CMP system: dotted line: experimental curve; solid line: simulated curve (an adduct formation was taken into account); dashed line: simulated curve (an adduct formation was not taken into account).
Figure 2Distribution diagram for the Asp/CMP system; percentage of the species refers to total ligands. (1) H3Asp; (2) H2Asp; (3) HAsp; (4) Asp; (5) H2CMP; (6) HCMP; (7) CMP; (8) (Asp)H4(CMP); (9) (Asp)H3(CMP); (10) (Asp)H2(CMP); (11) (Asp)H(CMP); CAsp = 6 × 10−3 M; CCMP = 6 × 10−3 M.
Differences between 13C NMR and 31P NMR chemical shifts for the ligands in the Asp/CMP system in relation to the free ligands [ppm].
| Asp | CMP | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | C(1) | C(2) | C(3) | C(4) | C(2) | C(4) | C(5) | C(6) | C(5′) | P |
| 3.0 | 0.049 | 0.025 | 0.022 | 0.002 | 0.982 | 0.760 | 0.057 | 0.048 | 0.044 | 0.018 |
| 4.2 | 0.000 | 0.013 | 0.070 | 0.054 | 0.861 | 0.661 | 0.040 | 0.047 | 0.060 | 0.025 |
| 5.5 | 0.053 | 0.047 | 0.027 | 0.040 | 0.440 | 0.593 | 0.068 | 0.054 | 0.099 | 0.040 |
| 8.0 | 0.454 | 1.048 | 0.227 | 1.322 | 0.191 | 0.198 | 0.068 | 0.064 | 0.111 | 0.105 |
Figure 3IR spectra of Asp and (Asp)H(CMP) adduct pH = 8; CAsp = 0.2 M, CCMP = 0.2 M.
Scheme 2Noncovalent interaction in the Asp/CMP system.
Overall stability constants (log β) and equilibrium constants (log K ) for the complexes of Cu(II) ions with Asp or CMP and Cu(II) ions with Asp and CMP.
| Equilibrium | log | log |
|---|---|---|
| Cu + CMP ⇆ Cu(CMP) | 2.71 (7) [ | 2.71 |
| Cu + CMP + H2O ⇆ Cu(CMP)(OH) + H+ | −4.26 (6) [ | |
|
| ||
| Cu + H+ + Asp ⇆ CuH(Asp) | 12.78 (5) | 3.15 |
| Cu + Asp ⇆ Cu(Asp) | 8.76 (3) | 8.76 |
| Cu + 2Asp ⇆ Cu(Asp)2 | 15.35 (4) | 6.59 |
| Cu + Asp + H2O ⇆ Cu(Asp)(OH) + H+ | 0.79 (9) | |
|
| ||
| Cu + 4H+ + Asp + CMP ⇆ Cu(Asp)H4(CMP) | 32.86 (5) | |
| Cu + 3H+ + Asp+CMP ⇆ Cu(Asp)H3(CMP) | 29.14 (5) | 5.46 |
| Cu + 2H+ + Asp + CMP ⇆ Cu(Asp)H2(CMP) | 25.28 (4) | 6.08 |
| Cu + H+ + Asp + CMP ⇆ Cu(Asp)H(CMP) | 20.12 (4) | 4.94 |
| Cu + H++ 2Asp + CMP ⇆ Cu(Asp)2H(CMP) | 29.87 (4) | |
| Cu + Asp + CMP + H2O ⇆ Cu(Asp)(CMP)(OH) + H+ | 4.69 (4) | |
Vis and EPR spectral data for Cu(II)/Asp and Cu(II)/Asp/CMP systems.
| Species | pH |
|
| EPR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
| CuH(Asp) | 3 | 756 | 27 | 2.413 | 134 |
| Cu(Asp) | 5 | 700 | 40 | 2.301 | 171 |
| Cu(Asp)2 | 8 | 630 | 76 | 2.257 | 187 |
|
| |||||
| Cu(Asp)H4(CMP) | 3 | 780 | 25 | 2.409 | 138 |
| Cu(Asp)H2(CMP) | 4.5 | 710 | 29 | 2.275 | 179 |
| Cu(Asp)H(CMP) | 6 | 700 | 30 | 2.269 | 182 |
| Cu(Asp)2H(CMP) | 8 | 660 | 49 | 2.261 | 182 |
| Cu(Asp)(CMP)(OH) | 10.5 | 630 | 96 | 2.258 | 183 |
Differences between 13C NMR and 31P NMR chemical shifts for the ligands in the Cu(II)/Asp and Cu(II)/Asp/CMP systems in relation to metal-free systems [ppm].
| Systems | Asp | CMP | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | C(1) | C(2) | C(3) | C(4) | C(2) | C(4) | C(5) | C(6) | C(5′) | P | |
| Cu(II)/Asp | 3.0 | 1.536 | 0.129 | 0.122 | 1.163 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 5.5 | 0.050 | 0.070 | 0.020 | 0.050 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 8.0 | 0.595 | 0.602 | 0.169 | 0.755 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
| |||||||||||
| Cu(II)/Asp/CMP | 3.0 | 1.371 | 0.460 | 0.147 | 1.094 | 0.463 | 0.528 | 0.075 | 0.085 | 0.057 | 0.166 |
| 4.5 | 0.069 | 0.643 | 0.113 | 0.080 | 1.042 | 0.932 | 0.052 | 0.047 | 0.051 | 0.080 | |
| 6.0 | 0.769 | 0.782 | 0.142 | 0.809 | 0.486 | 0.772 | 0.062 | 0.046 | 0.076 | 0.190 | |
| 8.0 | 0.809 | 0.749 | 0.152 | 0.689 | 0.860 | 0.858 | 0.071 | 0.064 | 0.062 | 0.129 | |
Figure 4Distribution diagram for the Cu(II)/Asp/CMP system; percentage of the species refers to total metal. (1) H3Asp; (2) H2Asp; (3) HAsp; (4) Asp; (5) H2(CMP); (6) H(CMP); (7) CMP; (8) Cu(Asp)2; (9) Cu(Asp)(OH); (10) Cu(Asp)H4(CMP); (11) Cu(Asp)H3(CMP); (12) Cu(Asp)H2(CMP); (13) Cu(Asp)H(CMP); (14) Cu(Asp)2H(CMP); (15) Cu(Asp)(CMP)(OH); CCu = 1 × 10−3 M; CAsp = 2.5 × 10−3 M; CCMP = 2.5 × 10−3 M.
Scheme 3Tentative mode of interaction in the Cu(Asp)H(CMP) complex.