AIMS: BRCA1-related breast cancer is associated with a basal-like phenotype, and is frequently oestrogen receptor (ER) and HER2 negative. The expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been considered to be one component of the basal-like phenotype, but no standard criteria exist. This study investigates the relationship between EGFR expression, BRCA1 status and basal markers with respect to clinicopathological associations and prognosis, in addition to evaluating different criteria for EGFR assessment by immunohistochemistry. METHODS: A tissue microarray comprising 230 available cases, from a series of primary invasive breast cancer diagnosed in Ashkenazi Jewish women during 1980-1995, was stained for EGFR using the Dako PharmDX kit, and evaluated by Webslide virtual microscopy. RESULTS: EGFR was positive in 9-19% according to different criteria. Expression was associated with BRCA1 carrier status and basal-like markers as negative ER, positive cytokeratin 5/6 and positive P-cadherin staining. EGFR was prognostically significant by univariate and multivariate analysis within the group carrying germ-line BRCA1 mutations. Histological grade, axillary lymph node status and P-cadherin status had significant independent value in the final multivariate model including all cases, whereas EGFR was not significant in this model. All five scoring systems gave comparable results concerning clinicopathological associations and patient outcome, although the most restrictive criteria (EGFR-HI) tended to be most sensitive in predicting BRCA1 status, a basal phenotype, and patient prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: EGFR expression, being present in 9-19% of the cases, was prognostically significant among BRCA1 mutated cases only. In multivariate survival analysis of all cases, no independent effect was seen. However, EGFR immunostaining might be relevant to predict the response to targeted therapy, and this should be studied further.
AIMS: BRCA1-related breast cancer is associated with a basal-like phenotype, and is frequently oestrogen receptor (ER) and HER2 negative. The expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been considered to be one component of the basal-like phenotype, but no standard criteria exist. This study investigates the relationship between EGFR expression, BRCA1 status and basal markers with respect to clinicopathological associations and prognosis, in addition to evaluating different criteria for EGFR assessment by immunohistochemistry. METHODS: A tissue microarray comprising 230 available cases, from a series of primary invasive breast cancer diagnosed in Ashkenazi Jewish women during 1980-1995, was stained for EGFR using the Dako PharmDX kit, and evaluated by Webslide virtual microscopy. RESULTS:EGFR was positive in 9-19% according to different criteria. Expression was associated with BRCA1 carrier status and basal-like markers as negative ER, positive cytokeratin 5/6 and positive P-cadherin staining. EGFR was prognostically significant by univariate and multivariate analysis within the group carrying germ-line BRCA1 mutations. Histological grade, axillary lymph node status and P-cadherin status had significant independent value in the final multivariate model including all cases, whereas EGFR was not significant in this model. All five scoring systems gave comparable results concerning clinicopathological associations and patient outcome, although the most restrictive criteria (EGFR-HI) tended to be most sensitive in predicting BRCA1 status, a basal phenotype, and patient prognosis. CONCLUSIONS:EGFR expression, being present in 9-19% of the cases, was prognostically significant among BRCA1 mutated cases only. In multivariate survival analysis of all cases, no independent effect was seen. However, EGFR immunostaining might be relevant to predict the response to targeted therapy, and this should be studied further.
Authors: E Kumaraswamy; K L Wendt; L A Augustine; S R Stecklein; E C Sibala; D Li; S Gunewardena; R A Jensen Journal: Oncogene Date: 2014-11-24 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Hui Li; Sara Duhachek-Muggy; Yue Qi; Yan Hong; Fariba Behbod; Anna Zolkiewska Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2012-08-29 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Neftali Vazquez; Alma Lopez; Victoria Cuello; Michael Persans; Erin Schuenzel; Wendy Innis-Whitehouse; Megan Keniry Journal: Cancer Treat Res Commun Date: 2021-02-17
Authors: Kevin C H Ha; Emilie Lalonde; Lili Li; Luca Cavallone; Rachael Natrajan; Maryou B Lambros; Costas Mitsopoulos; Jarle Hakas; Iwanka Kozarewa; Kerry Fenwick; Chris J Lord; Alan Ashworth; Anne Vincent-Salomon; Mark Basik; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Jacek Majewski; William D Foulkes Journal: BMC Med Genomics Date: 2011-10-27 Impact factor: 3.063