Literature DB >> 18682227

Iterative assembly of helical proteins by optimal hydrophobic packing.

G Albert Wu1, Evangelos A Coutsias, Ken A Dill.   

Abstract

We present a method for the computer-based iterative assembly of native-like tertiary structures of helical proteins from alpha-helical fragments. For any pair of helices, our method, called MATCHSTIX, first generates an ensemble of possible relative orientations of the helices with various ways to form hydrophobic contacts between them. Those conformations having steric clashes, or a large radius of gyration of hydrophobic residues, or with helices too far separated to be connected by the intervening linking region, are discarded. Then, we attempt to connect the two helical fragments by using a robotics-based loop-closure algorithm. When loop closure is feasible, the algorithm generates an ensemble of viable interconnecting loops. After energy minimization and clustering, we use a representative set of conformations for further assembly with the remaining helices, adding one helix at a time. To efficiently sample the conformational space, the order of assembly generally proceeds from the pair of helices connected by the shortest loop, followed by joining one of its adjacent helices, always proceeding with the shorter connecting loop. We tested MATCHSTIX on 28 helical proteins each containing up to 5 helices and found it to heavily sample native-like conformations. The average rmsd of the best conformations for the 17 helix-bundle proteins that have 2 or 3 helices is less than 2 A; errors increase somewhat for proteins containing more helices. Native-like states are even more densely sampled when disulfide bonds are known and imposed as restraints. We conclude that, at least for helical proteins, if the secondary structures are known, this rapid rigid-body maximization of hydrophobic interactions can lead to small ensembles of highly native-like structures. It may be useful for protein structure prediction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18682227      PMCID: PMC2629734          DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2008.04.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Structure        ISSN: 0969-2126            Impact factor:   5.006


  37 in total

1.  Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices.

Authors:  D T Jones
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-09-17       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  A novel method for sampling alpha-helical protein backbones.

Authors:  B Fain; M Levitt
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-01-12       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Protein decoy assembly using short fragments under geometric constraints.

Authors:  R Kolodny; M Levitt
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.505

Review 4.  Rotamer libraries in the 21st century.

Authors:  Roland L Dunbrack
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.809

5.  Structure validation by Calpha geometry: phi,psi and Cbeta deviation.

Authors:  Simon C Lovell; Ian W Davis; W Bryan Arendall; Paul I W de Bakker; J Michael Word; Michael G Prisant; Jane S Richardson; David C Richardson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003-02-15

6.  Assembly of protein tertiary structures from secondary structures using optimized potentials.

Authors:  Trinh Xuan Hoang; Flavio Seno; Jayanth R Banavar; Marek Cieplak; Amos Maritan
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003-08-01

7.  Hydrophobic potential of mean force as a solvation function for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Matthew S Lin; Nicolas Lux Fawzi; Teresa Head-Gordon
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  Backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins. Application to side-chain prediction.

Authors:  R L Dunbrack; M Karplus
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1993-03-20       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Predicting the helix packing of globular proteins by self-correcting distance geometry.

Authors:  C Mumenthaler; W Braun
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  On side-chain conformational entropy of proteins.

Authors:  Jinfeng Zhang; Jun S Liu
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  4 in total

1.  Union of geometric constraint-based simulations with molecular dynamics for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Tyler J Glembo; S Banu Ozkan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Accelerating molecular simulations of proteins using Bayesian inference on weak information.

Authors:  Alberto Perez; Justin L MacCallum; Ken A Dill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Refinement of protein structures into low-resolution density maps using rosetta.

Authors:  Frank DiMaio; Michael D Tyka; Matthew L Baker; Wah Chiu; David Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  An amino acid code to define a protein's tertiary packing surface.

Authors:  Keith J Fraga; Hyun Joo; Jerry Tsai
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-12-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.