Literature DB >> 18681992

Highly purified HMG versus recombinant FSH for ovarian stimulation in IVF cycles.

Peter Platteau1, Anders Nyboe Andersen, Anne Loft, Johan Smitz, Pascal Danglas, Paul Devroey.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the live birth rates resulting from ovarian stimulation with highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin (HP-HMG), which combines FSH and human chorionic gonadotrophin-driven LH activities, or recombinant FSH (rFSH) alone in women undergoing IVF cycles. An integrated analysis was performed of the raw data from two randomized controlled trials that were highly comparable in terms of eligibility criteria and post-randomization treatment regimens with either HP-HMG or rFSH for ovarian stimulation in IVF, following a long down-regulation protocol. All randomized subjects who received at least one dose of gonadotrophin in an IVF cycle (HP-HMG, n = 491; rFSH, n = 495) were included in the analysis. Subjects who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles were excluded. The superiority of one gonadotrophin preparation over the other was tested using the likelihood ratio test in a logistic regression analysis. The live birth rate per cycle initiated was 26.5% (130/491) with HP-HMG and 20.8% (103/495) with rFSH (P = 0.041). The odds ratio in favour of HP-HMG was 1.36 (95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.83). Thus, the findings of this integrated analysis demonstrate that ovarian stimulation with HP-HMG, following a long down-regulation protocol, in IVF cycles results in significantly more live births than stimulation with rFSH alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18681992     DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60194-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  10 in total

1.  Outcome of in vitro fertilization in patients with proven poor ovarian responsiveness after early vs. mid-follicular LH exposure: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Alberto Revelli; Alessandra Chiado'; Daniela Guidetti; Francesca Bongioanni; Valentina Rovei; Gianluca Gennarelli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Effects of urinary and recombinant gonadotropins on in vitro maturation outcomes of mouse preantral follicles.

Authors:  Kyung Eui Park; Seung-Yup Ku; Kyung Cheon Jung; Hung Ching Liu; Yoon Young Kim; Yong Jin Kim; Seok Hyun Kim; Young Min Choi; Jung Gu Kim; Shin Yong Moon
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 3.  Recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone produces more oocytes with a lower total dose per cycle in assisted reproductive technologies compared with highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Philippe Lehert; Joan C Schertz; Diego Ezcurra
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 5.211

4.  Observational Study to Assess the Therapeutic Value of Four Ovarian Hyperstimulation Protocols in IVF After Pituitary Suppression with GnRH Antagonists in Normally Responding Women.

Authors:  Monzó Ana; Montañana Vicente; Rubio José María; García-Gimeno Trinidad; Romeu Alberto
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Reprod Health       Date:  2011-02-22

5.  The ratio of exogenous Luteinizing hormone to Follicle stimulating hormone administered for controlled ovarian stimulation is associated with oocytes' number and competence.

Authors:  Dragos Albu; Alice Albu
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Amino acid turnover by human oocytes is influenced by gamete developmental competence, patient characteristics and gonadotrophin treatment.

Authors:  K E Hemmings; D Maruthini; S Vyjayanthi; J E Hogg; A H Balen; B K Campbell; H J Leese; H M Picton
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Endocrine profile following stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone versus highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin.

Authors:  Antonio Requena; María Cruz; Francisco J Ruiz; Juan A García-Velasco
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 5.211

8.  A Comparison of Outcomes from In Vitro Fertilization Cycles Stimulated with Follicle Stimulating Hormone Plus either Recombinant Luteinizing Hormone or Human Menopausal Gonadotropins in Subjects Treated with Long Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Agonist Protocols.

Authors:  Nathalie Bleau; Mohammed Agdi; WeonYoung Son; SeangLin Tan; Michael H Dahan
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-02-16

9.  Gonadotropin versus Follicle-Stimulating Hormone for Ovarian Response in Patients Undergoing in vitro Fertilization: A Retrospective Cohort Comparison.

Authors:  Zhisong Ji; Xiaozhen Quan; Yanli Lan; Meng Zhao; Xiaolong Tian; Xuezhou Yang
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2019-12-02

Review 10.  Interplay Between mTOR and Hippo Signaling in the Ovary: Clinical Choice Guidance Between Different Gonadotropin Preparations for Better IVF.

Authors:  Kyriaki Papageorgiou; Eirini Mastora; Athanasios Zikopoulos; Maria E Grigoriou; Ioannis Georgiou; Theologos M Michaelidis
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 5.555

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.