Literature DB >> 18681205

Surgical approaches for antrochoanal polyp: a comparative analysis.

F Ozer1, C Ozer, C A Cagici, T Canbolat, C Yilmazer, B Akkuzu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and histopathological characteristics of antrochoanal polyps (ACPs) and to perform a comparative analysis of surgical techniques in terms of recurrence.
METHODS: The clinical, radiological and histopathological features of 42 patients with a diagnosis of ACP who underwent surgery in a period of 6 years (January 2000 - January 2006) were investigated retrospectively. Histopathological examinations were present for all patients and were re-examined for histological analysis.
RESULTS: Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) was performed in all patients. Transcanine sinoscopy (TS) and the Caldwell-Luc approach (CL) were used in addition to ESS in 14 and 13 patients respectively. The attachment site was detected in 21 patients (50%) and the most frequent site was found to be the lateral wall in 15 patients (71.4%). There was no relationship between the choice of surgery, the attachment site or accessory ostium, or any sinusitis with ACP. Histological examination showed prominent eosinophilia in 29 patients (69%). The follow-up time was a minimum of 12 months with a mean of 28.9 months. Three recurrences were seen after ESS. However, there was no recurrence after ESS+TS and ESS+CL.
CONCLUSION: Our study showed that the most important factors affecting the choice of surgical approaches are the preference of the surgeon, the age of the patient and the presence of recurrent disease. Combined approaches with either TS or CL should be considered, particularly when the attachment site of the antral part of ACP is undetected, in order to prevent incomplete excision and recurrences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18681205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  B-ENT        ISSN: 1781-782X            Impact factor:   0.082


  7 in total

Review 1.  Comprehensive review on endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Rainer K Weber; Werner Hosemann
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-22

2.  Antrochoanal polyp: a comparative study of endoscopic endonasal surgery alone and endoscopic endonasal plus mini-Caldwell technique.

Authors:  Saeid Atighechi; Mohammad Hossein Baradaranfar; Ghasem Karimi; Rozita Jafari
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Endoscopic management of antrochoanal polyps: a single UK centre's experience.

Authors:  Natasha Choudhury; Ahmad Hariri; Hesham Saleh
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Unexpected rare complication of the facial paralysis in a patient with an antrochoanal polyp following canine fossa puncture.

Authors:  Ah-Young Kim; Myoung Su Choi
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-05-14

5.  Evaluation and management of antrochoanal polyps.

Authors:  Huseyin Yaman; Suleyman Yilmaz; Elif Karali; Ender Guclu; Ozcan Ozturk
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 3.372

6.  Antrochoanal polyposis: analysis of 34 cases.

Authors:  H H Balikci; M H Ozkul; O Uvacin; H Yasar; M Karakas; M Gurdal
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Endoscopic management of paediatric antrochoanal polyp: our experience.

Authors:  A A El-Sharkawy
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.124

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.