Literature DB >> 18681080

Economic burden of rhinitis in managed care: a retrospective claims data analysis.

Anand A Dalal1, Richard Stanford, Henk Henry, Bijan Borah.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the specific cost effect of rhinitis on third-party payers. No recently reported studies have examined the economic burden of rhinitis in managed care. Furthermore, the direct costs of chronic rhinitis have not been evaluated and potential differences in health care use and costs of allergic rhinitis have not been examined.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the economic burden of allergic rhinitis and chronic rhinitis to third-party payers in a large US managed care plan.
METHODS: In a retrospective analysis using pharmacy and medical claims data from a US health plan covering approximately 15 million members, health care use and cost data were summarized for patients with allergic or chronic rhinitis (n = 301,001) for the 13-month study period (January 1, 2004, to January 31, 2005).
RESULTS: Average rhinitis-related total costs were $657 per patient each year ($319 in medical costs and $338 in pharmacy costs). Ambulatory visits were the primary contributor to rhinitis-related medical costs. Antihistamines were the most common rhinitis medication, followed by intranasal corticosteroids (INSs) and montelukast. Many patients (37% with at least 1 filled prescription for an antihistamine, an INS, or montelukast) used combination therapy. Of the 3 main pharmacotherapy categories, montelukast was associated with the highest pharmacy cost ($353 vs $198 for antihistamines and $231 for INSs per patient each year for monotherapy) and drove the average annual cost of combination therapy regardless of the concomitant medication(s). The most common comorbidities were sinusitis and asthma, present in 51.1% and 27.9% of patients, respectively. Comorbidities increased rhinitis-related health care costs.
CONCLUSIONS: Allergic rhinitis and chronic rhinitis imposed a significant financial burden on third-party payers in a large US managed care plan. The presence of comorbidities further increased the rhinitis-related treatment costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18681080     DOI: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60830-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol        ISSN: 1081-1206            Impact factor:   6.347


  8 in total

Review 1.  Concomitant corticosteroid nasal spray plus antihistamine (oral or local spray) for the symptomatic management of allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Shaoyan Feng; Yunping Fan; Zibin Liang; Renqiang Ma; Wanwei Cao
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Diode laser treatment in therapy-resistant allergic rhinitis: impact on nasal obstruction and associated symptoms.

Authors:  Philipp P Caffier; Hans Scherer; Konrad Neumann; Sven Lück; Harald Enzmann; Andreas Haisch
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-07-10       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 3.  Current and Future Treatments of Rhinitis and Sinusitis.

Authors:  Gayatri B Patel; Robert C Kern; Jonathan A Bernstein; Park Hae-Sim; Anju T Peters
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2020-01-28

4.  Comparison of corticosteroid nasal sprays in relation to concomitant use and cost of other prescription medications to treat allergic rhinitis symptoms: retrospective cohort analysis of pharmacy claims data.

Authors:  Cindy Garris; Manan Shah; Anna D'Souza; Richard Stanford
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.859

5.  [Evidence-based treatment options for allergic diseases in otolaryngology: an update].

Authors:  L Klimek; A Sperl
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 6.  Pharmacoeconomics of sublingual immunotherapy with the 5-grass pollen tablets for seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Carlo Lombardi; Valerie Melli; Cristoforo Incorvaia; Erminia Ridolo
Journal:  Clin Mol Allergy       Date:  2017-03-07

7.  Treating nasal symptoms associated with rhinitis using the intranasal herbal ointment Biyeom-go: A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Mi Ju Son; Jeeyoun Jung; Young-Eun Kim; Chang-Sub Yeum; So Min Lee; So Young Jung; Ojin Kwon; Sungha Kim; Jeong-In Kang; Hye-Lin Kim; Jung-Eun Lee; Dong-Hyo Lee
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 2.597

Review 8.  A review of the clinical efficacy and safety of MP-AzeFlu, a novel intranasal formulation of azelastine hydrochloride and fluticasone propionate, in clinical studies conducted during different allergy seasons in the US.

Authors:  Bruce M Prenner
Journal:  J Asthma Allergy       Date:  2016-07-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.