Literature DB >> 18680210

Relationships among objective measures and speech perception in adult users of the HiResolution Bionic Ear.

Jace Wolfe1, Heather Kasulis.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe speech recognition performance for subjects using electrically evoked stapedial reflex thresholds (eSRT) based on programs with the HiResolution Bionic Ear system. A secondary goal was to evaluate the relationship of the electrically evoked compound action potentials (eCAP) as measured with neural response imaging (NRI) relative to the subjects' most comfortable stimulation levels (M levels). M levels, eSRT and eCAP thresholds were measured in 19 postlinguistically deafened adults using either a CII or HiRes 90K cochlear implant. The results showed that eSRTs could be measured easily in a majority of subjects, whereas eCAPS were measured in all subjects. There were close agreements between eSRTs and M levels in the subjects' behaviorally based programs. In contrast, the correspondence between M levels and eCAP thresholds was not as strong. New programs were created with M levels based on the eSRTs for 11 subjects. Programs created using eSRTs as a guide for setting levels yielded better speech recognition than programs using conventional behavioural measures of M levels. These data indicate that individuals can obtain strong benefits from cochlear implants using programs with stimulation levels based on objective measures.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18680210     DOI: 10.1179/cim.2008.9.2.70

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int        ISSN: 1467-0100


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Intra- and postoperative electrophysiological diagnostics].

Authors:  T Wesarg; S Arndt; A Aschendorff; R Laszig; R Beck; L Jung; S Zirn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Recommendations for Measuring the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency.

Authors:  Shuman He; Xiuhua Chao; Ruijie Wang; Jianfen Luo; Lei Xu; Holly F B Teagle; Lisa R Park; Kevin D Brown; Michelle Shannon; Cynthia Warner; Angela Pellittieri; William J Riggs
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Wideband Acoustic Immittance in Cochlear Implant Recipients: Reflectance and Stapedial Reflexes.

Authors:  Rachel A Scheperle; Joshua J Hajicek
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  [Objective measures for setting the processors of cochlear implant systems : Use of discrimination functions and consideration of electrode profiles].

Authors:  S Hoth; I Herisanu; M Praetorius
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  CCi-MOBILE: A Portable Real Time Speech Processing Platform for Cochlear Implant and Hearing Research.

Authors:  Ria Ghosh; Hussnain Ali; John H L Hansen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Comparison of electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and loudness estimates for the stimuli used to program the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant.

Authors:  Eun Kyung Jeon; Carolyn J Brown; Christine P Etler; Sara O'Brien; Li-Kuei Chiou; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 7.  Cochlear Implantation for Children and Adults with Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Lavin K Entwisle; Sarah E Warren; Jessica J Messersmith
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

Review 8.  The Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential: From Laboratory to Clinic.

Authors:  Shuman He; Holly F B Teagle; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 4.677

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.