Literature DB >> 18678792

Selecting among second-step antidepressant medication monotherapies: predictive value of clinical, demographic, or first-step treatment features.

A John Rush1, Stephen R Wisniewski, Diane Warden, James F Luther, Lori L Davis, Maurizio Fava, Andrew A Nierenberg, Madhukar H Trivedi.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Little is known about selecting among second-step medications for major depressive disorder after intolerance or lack of remission with an initial selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether sociodemographic, clinical, or first-step treatment features predict remission with or intolerance overall or differentially to any 1 of 3 second-step medications after an unsatisfactory outcome with citalopram hydrobromide.
DESIGN: An equipoise stratified randomized study. Participants were recruited from July 17, 2001, through April 20, 2004.
SETTING: Public or private sector primary care (n = 18) and psychiatric care (n = 23) settings across the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Representative outpatients aged 18 to 75 years with nonpsychotic major depressive disorder (N = 727).
INTERVENTIONS: Sustained-release bupropion hydrochloride was started at 150 mg/d and incrementally increased to 400 mg/d. Sertraline hydrochloride was started at 50 mg/d and incrementally increased to 200 mg/d. Extended-release venlafaxine hydrochloride was started at 37.5 mg/d and incrementally increased to 375 mg/d. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Self-Rated and the Frequency, Intensity, and Burden of Side Effects Rating.
RESULTS: Remission was more likely among participants who were white, employed, cohabiting or married, or privately insured or who had prior intolerance to citalopram or at least a response to citalopram, and no prior suicide attempts. Remission was less likely among participants with concurrent generalized anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, panic, or posttraumatic stress disorders; social phobia; anxious or melancholic features; or more severe depression. Intolerance was less likely for Hispanic participants, but more likely for participants with previous suicide attempts or intolerance to citalopram. Participants with concurrent substance use were less likely to remit (odds ratio, 0.37) and more likely not to tolerate extended-release venlafaxine. Intolerance to citalopram was associated with intolerance to sertraline (P = .04).
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical, demographic, and treatment history were of little value in recommending 1 medication vs another as a second-step treatment for major depressive disorder. Participants most likely to remit in the second step had less Axis I psychiatric disorder comorbidity, less social disadvantage, and at least a response to citalopram in the first step. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00021528.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18678792     DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.65.8.870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry        ISSN: 0003-990X


  52 in total

1.  Adolescence as a unique developmental period.

Authors:  Natalia Jaworska; Glenda MacQueen
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 6.186

Review 2.  Treatment-resistant depression: recent developments and future directions.

Authors:  Sanjay J Mathew
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.505

Review 3.  Treatment-resistant depression and mortality after acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Robert M Carney; Kenneth E Freedland
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 18.112

4.  Tackling partial response to depression treatment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2009

5.  Individual Differences in Response to Antidepressants: A Meta-analysis of Placebo-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Marta M Maslej; Toshiaki A Furukawa; Andrea Cipriani; Paul W Andrews; Benoit H Mulsant
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 21.596

Review 6.  Depression and Anxiety in Heart Failure: A Review.

Authors:  Christopher M Celano; Ana C Villegas; Ariana M Albanese; Hanna K Gaggin; Jeff C Huffman
Journal:  Harv Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2018 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Transcriptional signatures related to glucose and lipid metabolism predict treatment response to the tumor necrosis factor antagonist infliximab in patients with treatment-resistant depression.

Authors:  Divya Mehta; Charles L Raison; Bobbi J Woolwine; Ebrahim Haroon; Elisabeth B Binder; Andrew H Miller; Jennifer C Felger
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 7.217

8.  Amygdala Reactivity to Emotional Faces in the Prediction of General and Medication-Specific Responses to Antidepressant Treatment in the Randomized iSPOT-D Trial.

Authors:  Leanne M Williams; Mayuresh S Korgaonkar; Yun C Song; Rebecca Paton; Sarah Eagles; Andrea Goldstein-Piekarski; Stuart M Grieve; Anthony W F Harris; Tim Usherwood; Amit Etkin
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 7.853

9.  Do baseline sub-threshold hypomanic symptoms affect acute-phase antidepressant outcome in outpatients with major depressive disorder? Preliminary findings from the randomized CO-MED trial.

Authors:  Manish K Jha; Ashley L Malchow; Bruce D Grannemann; A John Rush; Madhukar H Trivedi
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 7.853

10.  Targeting treatments for depression: what can our patients tell us?

Authors:  A John Rush
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 6.892

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.