OBJECTIVE: Verifying the association between glycemic fluctuation and GH response in the glucagon stimulation test. Basal evaluation of growth hormone (GH) has poor diagnostic accuracy due to its pulsatile secretion. GH-stimulation tests are used for an adequate evaluation of somatotrophic axis. Various stimuli can be employed, among them glucagon, which has an elusive mechanism of action. Since hypoglycemia reportedly occurs during the test, investigation of its role as a stimulus to GH release is granted. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of glucagon-stimulated GH tests performed in 128 children (36.7% female; age 12.4+3.3 years), at Fleury Functional Tests Facility from July 2000 to 2006. GH and blood glucose (BG) curves, IGF-1, and IGFBP-3 have been assessed. Positive GH response was defined by a peak GH value >or=3.3 microg/L. Normal IGF-1 levels were defined as those between 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles for age and gender. RESULTS: Hypoglycemia under 2.2 mmol/L did not occur during the test. BG decrease occurred with lower magnitude and was not associated to GH response. Comparison between patients with negative and positive GH response showed, respectively, BG nadir 3.74 vs. 3.62 mmol/L, glucose AUC 23.3 vs. 22.4, and glycemic decrease (below 3.3 mmol/L) 19% vs. 35.5% (with P non-significant for all comparisons). CONCLUSION: Hypoglycemia was not seen after glucagon stimulation and decrease in BG occurred above levels physiologically expected to stimulate GH release, being apparently not associated to GH response.
OBJECTIVE: Verifying the association between glycemic fluctuation and GH response in the glucagon stimulation test. Basal evaluation of growth hormone (GH) has poor diagnostic accuracy due to its pulsatile secretion. GH-stimulation tests are used for an adequate evaluation of somatotrophic axis. Various stimuli can be employed, among them glucagon, which has an elusive mechanism of action. Since hypoglycemia reportedly occurs during the test, investigation of its role as a stimulus to GH release is granted. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of glucagon-stimulated GH tests performed in 128 children (36.7% female; age 12.4+3.3 years), at Fleury Functional Tests Facility from July 2000 to 2006. GH and blood glucose (BG) curves, IGF-1, and IGFBP-3 have been assessed. Positive GH response was defined by a peak GH value >or=3.3 microg/L. Normal IGF-1 levels were defined as those between 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles for age and gender. RESULTS:Hypoglycemia under 2.2 mmol/L did not occur during the test. BG decrease occurred with lower magnitude and was not associated to GH response. Comparison between patients with negative and positive GH response showed, respectively, BG nadir 3.74 vs. 3.62 mmol/L, glucose AUC 23.3 vs. 22.4, and glycemic decrease (below 3.3 mmol/L) 19% vs. 35.5% (with P non-significant for all comparisons). CONCLUSION:Hypoglycemia was not seen after glucagon stimulation and decrease in BG occurred above levels physiologically expected to stimulate GH release, being apparently not associated to GH response.
Authors: Kevin C J Yuen; Beverly M K Biller; Laurence Katznelson; Sharon A Rhoads; Michelle H Gurel; Olivia Chu; Valentina Corazzini; Kellie Spiller; Murray B Gordon; Roberto Salvatori; David M Cook Journal: Pituitary Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 4.107