Literature DB >> 18677421

Empirical assessments of clinical ethics services: implications for clinical ethics committees.

Laura Williamson1.   

Abstract

The need to evaluate the performance of clinical ethics services is widely acknowledged although work in this area is more developed in the United States. In the USA many studies that assess clinical ethics services have utilized empirical methods and assessment criteria. The value of these approaches is thought to rest on their ability to measure the value of services in a demonstrable fashion. However, empirical measures tend to lack ethical content, making their contribution to developments in ethical governance unclear. The steady increase of clinical ethics committees in the UK must be accompanied by efforts to evaluate their performance. As part of this evaluative work it is important to examine how the practice of clinical ethics committees can be informed by empirical measures.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 18677421      PMCID: PMC2493408          DOI: 10.1258/147775007783560184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ethics        ISSN: 1477-7509


  29 in total

1.  Consent and clinical governance: improving standards and skills.

Authors:  J Cowan
Journal:  Clin Perform Qual Health Care       Date:  2000

2.  Clinical ethics committees.

Authors:  A M Slowther; T Hope
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-09-16

Review 3.  Determinants of hospital ethics committee success.

Authors:  L S Scheirton
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  1992

4.  A survey of New Jersey hospital ethics committees.

Authors:  J C d'Oronzio; D Dunn; J J Gregory
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  1991

5.  Ethics consultation: time to focus on patients.

Authors:  J A Tulsky; B Lo
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  The reform of UK research ethics committees: throwing the baby out with the bath water?

Authors:  S Kerrison; A M Pollock
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 7.  Evaluating outcomes in ethics consultation research.

Authors:  E Fox; R M Arnold
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  1996

8.  Impact of ethics consultations in the intensive care setting: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  L J Schneiderman; T Gilmer; H D Teetzel
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Impact of pediatric ethics consultations on patients, families, social workers, and physicians.

Authors:  B M Yen; L J Schneiderman
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.521

10.  Effect of ethics consultations on nonbeneficial life-sustaining treatments in the intensive care setting: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lawrence J Schneiderman; Todd Gilmer; Holly D Teetzel; Daniel O Dugan; Jeffrey Blustein; Ronald Cranford; Kathleen B Briggs; Glen I Komatsu; Paula Goodman-Crews; Felicia Cohn; Ernlé W D Young
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-09-03       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  7 in total

1.  Inclusive consultation: a hermeneutical approach to ethical deliberation in the clinical setting.

Authors:  Andreas Vieth
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2011-12

2.  Evaluating parents' perspectives of pediatric ethics consultation.

Authors:  Frances Rieth Ward
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2013-06

3.  Points to consider: The research ethics consultation service and the IRB.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Christine Grady; Ana S Iltis; John Z Sadler; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec

Review 4.  Ethical case interventions for adult patients.

Authors:  Jan Schildmann; Stephan Nadolny; Joschka Haltaufderheide; Marjolein Gysels; Jochen Vollmann; Claudia Bausewein
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-07-22

5.  Evaluating assessment tools of the quality of clinical ethics consultations: a systematic scoping review from 1992 to 2019.

Authors:  Nicholas Yue Shuen Yoon; Yun Ting Ong; Hong Wei Yap; Kuang Teck Tay; Elijah Gin Lim; Clarissa Wei Shuen Cheong; Wei Qiang Lim; Annelissa Mien Chew Chin; Ying Pin Toh; Min Chiam; Stephen Mason; Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  Do we understand the intervention? What complex intervention research can teach us for the evaluation of clinical ethics support services (CESS).

Authors:  Jan Schildmann; Stephan Nadolny; Joschka Haltaufderheide; Marjolein Gysels; Jochen Vollmann; Claudia Bausewein
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Framework for evaluation research on clinical ethical case interventions: the role of ethics consultants.

Authors:  Joschka Haltaufderheide; Stephan Nadolny; Jochen Vollmann; Jan Schildmann
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 5.926

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.