Literature DB >> 18677181

Detection and treatment of refractory status epilepticus in the intensive care unit.

Frank W Drislane1, Maria R Lopez, Andrew S Blum, Donald L Schomer.   

Abstract

Status epilepticus (SE) is not rare in critically ill intensive care unit (ICU) patients, but its diagnosis is often delayed or missed, in part because it is mistaken for other causes of altered mental status. Even once diagnosed, SE in the ICU can be refractory to treatment. We sought to determine the causes, clinical features, and difficulties in diagnosis of SE in the ICU, and the effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on its course. We reviewed the course of ICU patients with both clinical and EEG evidence of SE, attempting to determine which patients are at risk for unsuspected SE, what was the typical delay in diagnosis, and whether AED treatment made a difference in their clinical courses. By clinical and EEG evidence, 91 ICU patients with SE were identified, all with abnormal mental status: 74 were comatose. Vascular disease (in 24) and anoxia (22) were the most common causes; most had multiple medical problems. Although 76 patients had clinically evident seizures earlier (and 56, clinical SE) only 20 were thought to be in SE at the time of the diagnostic EEG. There was a median delay of 48 hours from clinical deterioration until diagnosis in patients with earlier clinical seizures and 72 hours without seizures. Among the 68 nonanoxic patients treated with AEDs, 38 (56%) seemed to improve in alertness, including 25 who were comatose. Although patients who were stuporous or confused (vs. comatose) improved more often on AEDs, they were less often realized to be in SE before the EEG. Patients with earlier seizures were also more likely to improve, but no more likely to be diagnosed before the EEG. Patients who responded to AEDs were more likely to survive. ICU patients with altered mental status and EEG evidence of SE often have severe medical and surgical illnesses, refractory SE, and a high mortality. The delay to diagnosis is substantial, but a significant subset of patients improves on AEDs once SE is discovered. This diagnosis should be sought more often in ICU patients with abnormal mental status, especially after clinical seizures or SE without full recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18677181     DOI: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e31817be70e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0736-0258            Impact factor:   2.177


  13 in total

Review 1.  The utility of EEG, SSEP, and other neurophysiologic tools to guide neurocritical care.

Authors:  Eric S Rosenthal
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 2.  Continuous EEG monitoring in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Kennedy; Elizabeth E Gerard
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.081

3.  Single-channel amplitude integrated EEG recording for the identification of epileptic seizures by nonexpert physicians in the adult acute care setting.

Authors:  Rainer Nitzschke; Jakob Müller; Ria Engelhardt; Gunter N Schmidt
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Status epilepticus.

Authors:  Panayiotis N Varelas; Marek A Mirski
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 5.  Status epilepticus: an update.

Authors:  Panayiotis N Varelas; Marianna V Spanaki; Marek A Mirski
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.081

6.  Understanding and Managing the Ictal-Interictal Continuum in Neurocritical Care.

Authors:  Adithya Sivaraju; Emily J Gilmore
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.598

7.  Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus.

Authors:  Gretchen M Brophy; Rodney Bell; Jan Claassen; Brian Alldredge; Thomas P Bleck; Tracy Glauser; Suzette M Laroche; James J Riviello; Lori Shutter; Michael R Sperling; David M Treiman; Paul M Vespa
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.210

8.  Calculating the risk benefit equation for aggressive treatment of non-convulsive status epilepticus.

Authors:  Matthew Ferguson; Matt T Bianchi; Raoul Sutter; Eric S Rosenthal; Sydney S Cash; Peter W Kaplan; M Brandon Westover
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.210

9.  Non-convulsive status epilepticus and non-convulsive seizures in neurological ICU patients.

Authors:  Ikuko Laccheo; Hasan Sonmezturk; Amar B Bhatt; Luke Tomycz; Yaping Shi; Marianna Ringel; Gina DiCarlo; DeAngelo Harris; John Barwise; Bassel Abou-Khalil; Kevin F Haas
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 10.  Electrophysiologic monitoring in acute brain injury.

Authors:  Jan Claassen; Paul Vespa
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.210

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.