Literature DB >> 18677070

The impact of publicly funded family planning clinic services on unintended pregnancies and government cost savings.

Jennifer J Frost1, Lawrence B Finer, Athena Tapales.   

Abstract

Publicly funded family planning clinics serve millions of low-income women each year, providing a range of critical preventive services and enabling women to avoid unintended pregnancies. It is important to quantify the impact and cost-effectiveness of such services, in addition to these health benefits. Using a methodology similar to prior cost-benefit analyses, we estimated the numbers of unintended pregnancies prevented by all U.S. publicly funded family planning clinics in 2004, nationally (1.4 million pregnancies) and for each state. We also compared the actual costs of providing these services ($1.4 billion) with the anticipated public-sector costs for maternity and infant care among the Medicaid-eligible women whose births were averted ($5.7 billion) to calculate net public-sector savings ($4.3 billion). Thus, public expenditures for family planning care not only help women to achieve their childbearing goals, but they also save public dollars: Our calculations indicate that for every $1 spent, $4.02 is saved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18677070     DOI: 10.1353/hpu.0.0060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved        ISSN: 1049-2089


  27 in total

1.  Prenatal care and subsequent birth intervals.

Authors:  Julien O Teitler; Dhiman Das; Lakota Kruse; Nancy E Reichman
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2012-01-30

2.  Approaching 4 decades of legislation in the national family planning program: an analysis of Title X's history from 1970 to 2008.

Authors:  Cheryl A Vamos; Ellen M Daley; Kay M Perrin; Charles S Mahan; Eric R Buhi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Measuring the impact and outcomes of maternal child health federal programs.

Authors:  Yhenneko J Taylor; Mary A Nies
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-07

4.  Projecting the Unmet Need and Costs for Contraception Services After the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  Euna M August; Erika Steinmetz; Lorrie Gavin; Maria I Rivera; Karen Pazol; Susan Moskosky; Tasmeen Weik; Leighton Ku
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Potential unintended pregnancies averted and cost savings associated with a revised Medicaid sterilization policy.

Authors:  Sonya Borrero; Nikki Zite; Joseph E Potter; James Trussell; Kenneth Smith
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Does parental consent for birth control affect underage pregnancy rates? The case of Texas.

Authors:  Sourafel Girma; David Paton
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2013-12

Review 7.  Pregnancy Intention-More Important Than Ever.

Authors:  Susan B Moskosky
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 2.792

8.  Medicaid Expansion at Title X Clinics: Client Volume, Payer Mix, and Contraceptive Method Type.

Authors:  Michel Boudreaux; Yoon Sun Choi; Liyang Xie; Daniel Marthey
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Barriers and facilitators to family planning access in Canada.

Authors:  Jennifer Hulme; Sheila Dunn; Edith Guilbert; Judith Soon; Wendy Norman
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2015-02

10.  Teen birth rates in sexually abused and neglected females.

Authors:  Jennie G Noll; Chad E Shenk
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 7.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.