A Moskal1, J-L Martin, B Laumon. 1. Epidemiological Research & Surveillance Unit in Transport, Occupation and Environment, UMRESTTE, Joint Research Unit of INRETS, French Research Institute on Transport & Safety, Claude Bernard University of Lyon, Bron Cedex, France. aurelie.moskal@inrets.fr
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the effects of wearing a helmet on head and facial injury among users of motorized two-wheel vehicles and to determine if helmet use increases the risk of neck and cervical spine injury. DESIGN/ METHOD: A population-based study involving injured riders from the Rhône Road Trauma Registry from 1996 to 2005. Victims were only included if they had an injury to a body region other than (or in addition to) the head, face, neck, or cervical spine. Thus, inclusion was not affected by helmet use by the rider. The risk of head, face, neck, and cervical spine injury was assessed, with helmet use as the exposure of interest using logistic regression analyses. Adjusted odds ratios and corresponding confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: Helmet use significantly decreased the risk of head and facial injuries. The adjusted odds ratios for non-helmeted riders were 2.43 (95% CI 2.05 to 2.87) and 3.02 (95% CI 2.48 to 3.67), respectively. There was no association between helmet use and the occurrence of neck or cervical spine injuries. The adjusted odds ratios for non-helmeted riders were 0.86 (95% CI 0.60 to 1.23) and 1.04 (95% CI 0.78 to 1.39), respectively. CONCLUSION: Helmets protect users of motorized two-wheel vehicles against head and facial injury without increasing the risk of neck or cervical spine injury.
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the effects of wearing a helmet on head and facial injury among users of motorized two-wheel vehicles and to determine if helmet use increases the risk of neck and cervical spine injury. DESIGN/ METHOD: A population-based study involving injured riders from the Rhône Road Trauma Registry from 1996 to 2005. Victims were only included if they had an injury to a body region other than (or in addition to) the head, face, neck, or cervical spine. Thus, inclusion was not affected by helmet use by the rider. The risk of head, face, neck, and cervical spine injury was assessed, with helmet use as the exposure of interest using logistic regression analyses. Adjusted odds ratios and corresponding confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: Helmet use significantly decreased the risk of head and facial injuries. The adjusted odds ratios for non-helmeted riders were 2.43 (95% CI 2.05 to 2.87) and 3.02 (95% CI 2.48 to 3.67), respectively. There was no association between helmet use and the occurrence of neck or cervical spine injuries. The adjusted odds ratios for non-helmeted riders were 0.86 (95% CI 0.60 to 1.23) and 1.04 (95% CI 0.78 to 1.39), respectively. CONCLUSION: Helmets protect users of motorized two-wheel vehicles against head and facial injury without increasing the risk of neck or cervical spine injury.
Authors: Steven Rowson; Megan L Bland; Eamon T Campolettano; Jaclyn N Press; Bethany Rowson; Jake A Smith; David W Sproule; Abigail M Tyson; Stefan M Duma Journal: Sports Med Arthrosc Rev Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Latha Ganti; Aakash N Bodhit; Yasamin Daneshvar; Pratik Shashikant Patel; Christa Pulvino; Kelsey Hatchitt; Robyn M Hoelle; Keith R Peters; Sudeep Kuchibhotla; Lawrence Lottenberg; Andrea Gabrielli; Anna Mazzuoccolo; Marie-Carmelle Elie-Turenne; Tricia Falgiani; Porter W Maerz; Shivam M Kharod; Lauren M Conroy; Hussain M Khalid; J Adrian Tyndall Journal: Adv Prev Med Date: 2013-09-25