OBJECTIVE: To evaluate administration of chlortetracycline in feed of cattle as a method to select for tetracycline resistance among enteric bacteria in feedlot settings. ANIMALS: 20 steers. PROCEDURES: Steers were randomly assigned to an exposed cohort (n = 10) or an unexposed cohort (control cohort; 10). Chlortetracycline (22 mg/kg) in cottonseed meal was administered to the exposed cohort on days 0 through 4, 6 through 10, and 12 through 16. The control cohort was administered only cottonseed meal. Fecal samples were collected from 16 steers on days -7, 0, 2, 6, 8, 12, 14, 19, 22, 26, and 33, and Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp were isolated. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of selected antimicrobials was estimated. RESULTS: Overall, 56.0% and 31.4% of E coli and Enterococcus isolates, respectively, were resistant to tetracycline. Exposure to chlortetracycline was associated with a significant temporary increase in log(2) MIC for both genera but returned to preexposure values by day 33. Averaged across time, the proportion of tetracycline-resistant E coli and Enterococcus isolates was significantly greater in exposed than in unexposed steers. Although all ceftiofur-resistant E coli isolates were coresistant to tetracycline, exposure to chlortetracycline led to a significant decrease in the proportion of E coli resistant to ceftiofur during exposure. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Exposure to chlortetracycline was associated with a temporary increase in the likelihood of recovering resistant bacteria. Exposure to chlortetracycline decreased the likelihood of recovering ceftiofur-resistant E coli isolates, even though isolates were coresistant to tetracycline. These findings warrant further investigation.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate administration of chlortetracycline in feed of cattle as a method to select for tetracycline resistance among enteric bacteria in feedlot settings. ANIMALS: 20 steers. PROCEDURES: Steers were randomly assigned to an exposed cohort (n = 10) or an unexposed cohort (control cohort; 10). Chlortetracycline (22 mg/kg) in cottonseed meal was administered to the exposed cohort on days 0 through 4, 6 through 10, and 12 through 16. The control cohort was administered only cottonseed meal. Fecal samples were collected from 16 steers on days -7, 0, 2, 6, 8, 12, 14, 19, 22, 26, and 33, and Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp were isolated. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of selected antimicrobials was estimated. RESULTS: Overall, 56.0% and 31.4% of E coli and Enterococcus isolates, respectively, were resistant to tetracycline. Exposure to chlortetracycline was associated with a significant temporary increase in log(2) MIC for both genera but returned to preexposure values by day 33. Averaged across time, the proportion of tetracycline-resistant E coli and Enterococcus isolates was significantly greater in exposed than in unexposed steers. Although all ceftiofur-resistant E coli isolates were coresistant to tetracycline, exposure to chlortetracycline led to a significant decrease in the proportion of E coli resistant to ceftiofur during exposure. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Exposure to chlortetracycline was associated with a temporary increase in the likelihood of recovering resistant bacteria. Exposure to chlortetracycline decreased the likelihood of recovering ceftiofur-resistant E coli isolates, even though isolates were coresistant to tetracycline. These findings warrant further investigation.
Authors: Gizem Levent; Ashlynn Schlochtermeier; Samuel E Ives; Keri N Norman; Sara D Lawhon; Guy H Loneragan; Robin C Anderson; Javier Vinasco; H Morgan Scott Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2019-11-14 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Timothy J Johnson; Randall S Singer; Richard E Isaacson; Jessica L Danzeisen; Kevin Lang; Kristi Kobluk; Bernadette Rivet; Klaudyna Borewicz; Jonathan G Frye; Mark Englen; Janet Anderson; Peter R Davies Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2015-03-13 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Parasto Mirzaagha; Marie Louie; Ranjana Sharma; L Jay Yanke; Ed Topp; Tim A McAllister Journal: BMC Microbiol Date: 2011-04-19 Impact factor: 3.605
Authors: J S Weese; S Giguère; L Guardabassi; P S Morley; M Papich; D R Ricciuto; J E Sykes Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2015-03-17 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Naomi Ohta; Keri N Norman; Bo Norby; Sara D Lawhon; Javier Vinasco; Henk den Bakker; Guy H Loneragan; H Morgan Scott Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-10-30 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Neena Kanwar; H Morgan Scott; Bo Norby; Guy H Loneragan; Javier Vinasco; Matthew McGowan; Jennifer L Cottell; Muckatira M Chengappa; Jianfa Bai; Patrick Boerlin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-11-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Katharine M Benedict; Sheryl P Gow; Tim A McAllister; Calvin W Booker; Sherry J Hannon; Sylvia L Checkley; Noelle R Noyes; Paul S Morley Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-12-03 Impact factor: 3.240