Literature DB >> 18672961

Antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria recovered from feedlot cattle administered chlortetracycline in feed.

Tammy M Platt1, Guy H Loneragan, H Morgan Scott, Bo Norby, Daniel U Thomson, Michael S Brown, Michel S Brown, Samuel E Ives, Mindy M Brashears.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate administration of chlortetracycline in feed of cattle as a method to select for tetracycline resistance among enteric bacteria in feedlot settings. ANIMALS: 20 steers. PROCEDURES: Steers were randomly assigned to an exposed cohort (n = 10) or an unexposed cohort (control cohort; 10). Chlortetracycline (22 mg/kg) in cottonseed meal was administered to the exposed cohort on days 0 through 4, 6 through 10, and 12 through 16. The control cohort was administered only cottonseed meal. Fecal samples were collected from 16 steers on days -7, 0, 2, 6, 8, 12, 14, 19, 22, 26, and 33, and Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp were isolated. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of selected antimicrobials was estimated.
RESULTS: Overall, 56.0% and 31.4% of E coli and Enterococcus isolates, respectively, were resistant to tetracycline. Exposure to chlortetracycline was associated with a significant temporary increase in log(2) MIC for both genera but returned to preexposure values by day 33. Averaged across time, the proportion of tetracycline-resistant E coli and Enterococcus isolates was significantly greater in exposed than in unexposed steers. Although all ceftiofur-resistant E coli isolates were coresistant to tetracycline, exposure to chlortetracycline led to a significant decrease in the proportion of E coli resistant to ceftiofur during exposure. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Exposure to chlortetracycline was associated with a temporary increase in the likelihood of recovering resistant bacteria. Exposure to chlortetracycline decreased the likelihood of recovering ceftiofur-resistant E coli isolates, even though isolates were coresistant to tetracycline. These findings warrant further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18672961     DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.69.8.988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Vet Res        ISSN: 0002-9645            Impact factor:   1.156


  14 in total

1.  Effects of In-Feed Chlortetracycline Prophylaxis in Beef Cattle on Animal Health and Antimicrobial-Resistant Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Getahun E Agga; John W Schmidt; Terrance M Arthur
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Population Dynamics of Salmonella enterica within Beef Cattle Cohorts Followed from Single-Dose Metaphylactic Antibiotic Treatment until Slaughter.

Authors:  Gizem Levent; Ashlynn Schlochtermeier; Samuel E Ives; Keri N Norman; Sara D Lawhon; Guy H Loneragan; Robin C Anderson; Javier Vinasco; H Morgan Scott
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  In Vivo Transmission of an IncA/C Plasmid in Escherichia coli Depends on Tetracycline Concentration, and Acquisition of the Plasmid Results in a Variable Cost of Fitness.

Authors:  Timothy J Johnson; Randall S Singer; Richard E Isaacson; Jessica L Danzeisen; Kevin Lang; Kristi Kobluk; Bernadette Rivet; Klaudyna Borewicz; Jonathan G Frye; Mark Englen; Janet Anderson; Peter R Davies
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials.

Authors:  Parasto Mirzaagha; Marie Louie; Ranjana Sharma; L Jay Yanke; Ed Topp; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.605

5.  Antimicrobial resistance and virulence factors in Escherichia coli from Swedish dairy calves.

Authors:  Kerstin de Verdier; Ann Nyman; Christina Greko; Björn Bengtsson
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 1.695

6.  ACVIM consensus statement on therapeutic antimicrobial use in animals and antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  J S Weese; S Giguère; L Guardabassi; P S Morley; M Papich; D R Ricciuto; J E Sykes
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Monte Carlo Simulations Suggest Current Chlortetracycline Drug-Residue Based Withdrawal Periods Would Not Control Antimicrobial Resistance Dissemination from Feedlot to Slaughterhouse.

Authors:  Casey L Cazer; Lucas Ducrot; Victoriya V Volkova; Yrjö T Gröhn
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Population dynamics of enteric Salmonella in response to antimicrobial use in beef feedlot cattle.

Authors:  Naomi Ohta; Keri N Norman; Bo Norby; Sara D Lawhon; Javier Vinasco; Henk den Bakker; Guy H Loneragan; H Morgan Scott
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Effects of ceftiofur and chlortetracycline treatment strategies on antimicrobial susceptibility and on tet(A), tet(B), and bla CMY-2 resistance genes among E. coli isolated from the feces of feedlot cattle.

Authors:  Neena Kanwar; H Morgan Scott; Bo Norby; Guy H Loneragan; Javier Vinasco; Matthew McGowan; Jennifer L Cottell; Muckatira M Chengappa; Jianfa Bai; Patrick Boerlin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Recovered from Feedlot Cattle and Associations with Antimicrobial Use.

Authors:  Katharine M Benedict; Sheryl P Gow; Tim A McAllister; Calvin W Booker; Sherry J Hannon; Sylvia L Checkley; Noelle R Noyes; Paul S Morley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.