BACKGROUND: Prevalence and factors associated with etravirine (EW) resistance mutations among patients failing on first-generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) merit investigation. METHODS: The study comprised an analysis of all sequential patients attending the Institute of Infectious Diseases (Brescia, northern Italy) who performed a genotypic resistance testing (GRT) after > or =3 months of a stable NNRTI-based regimen between 2001 and 2006. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression analysis was performed to assess predictors of ETV resistance mutations. RESULTS: Out of 248 strains, 153 (61.7%) harboured > or =1 ETV resistance mutations. In particular, 88 (35.5%), 53 (21.4%) and 12 (4.8%) harboured one, two and three mutations, respectively. The most frequent mutations were G190A (230%), Y181C (23%) and K101E (14.1%). Use of nevirapine (odds ratio [OR] 2.73; 95% confidence level [CI] 1.62-4.62; P<0.001) and a longer time frame between first HIV RNA >500 copies/ml and GRT (per month, OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.01-1.09; P=0.012) were associated with a greater number of ETV resistance mutations. Conversely, higher CD4+ T-cell counts at nadir (per 100 cells/mm3, OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.67-0.98; P=0.029) and use of lamivudine/emtricitabine (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.37-0.87; P=0.009) were protective. Accumulation of ETV resistance-associated mutations was demonstrated by sequential GRT in 4/35 patients (all treated with nevirapine). CONCLUSIONS: Mutations associated with ETW resistance were common among patients failing on NNRTI, but prevalence of viral strains harbouring three mutations was low. Use of efavirenz and co-administration of lamivudine reduced the risk of ETW resistance. The continued use of the current NNRTI in a failing regimen may select for additional resistant variants.
BACKGROUND: Prevalence and factors associated with etravirine (EW) resistance mutations among patients failing on first-generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) merit investigation. METHODS: The study comprised an analysis of all sequential patients attending the Institute of Infectious Diseases (Brescia, northern Italy) who performed a genotypic resistance testing (GRT) after > or =3 months of a stable NNRTI-based regimen between 2001 and 2006. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression analysis was performed to assess predictors of ETV resistance mutations. RESULTS: Out of 248 strains, 153 (61.7%) harboured > or =1 ETV resistance mutations. In particular, 88 (35.5%), 53 (21.4%) and 12 (4.8%) harboured one, two and three mutations, respectively. The most frequent mutations were G190A (230%), Y181C (23%) and K101E (14.1%). Use of nevirapine (odds ratio [OR] 2.73; 95% confidence level [CI] 1.62-4.62; P<0.001) and a longer time frame between first HIV RNA >500 copies/ml and GRT (per month, OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.01-1.09; P=0.012) were associated with a greater number of ETV resistance mutations. Conversely, higher CD4+ T-cell counts at nadir (per 100 cells/mm3, OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.67-0.98; P=0.029) and use of lamivudine/emtricitabine (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.37-0.87; P=0.009) were protective. Accumulation of ETV resistance-associated mutations was demonstrated by sequential GRT in 4/35 patients (all treated with nevirapine). CONCLUSIONS: Mutations associated with ETW resistance were common among patients failing on NNRTI, but prevalence of viral strains harbouring three mutations was low. Use of efavirenz and co-administration of lamivudine reduced the risk of ETW resistance. The continued use of the current NNRTI in a failing regimen may select for additional resistant variants.
Authors: Eugene L Asahchop; Mark A Wainberg; Richard D Sloan; Cécile L Tremblay Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2012-06-25 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Weerawat Manosuthi; David M Butler; Wasun Chantratita; Chonlaphat Sukasem; Douglas D Richman; Davey M Smith Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Eugene L Asahchop; Maureen Oliveira; Mark A Wainberg; Bluma G Brenner; Daniela Moisi; Thomas d'Aquin Toni; Cecile L Tremblay Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2010-12-06 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Gert U van Zyl; Lisa M Frenkel; Michael H Chung; Wolfgang Preiser; John W Mellors; Jean B Nachega Journal: AIDS Date: 2014-11-28 Impact factor: 4.177