Literature DB >> 18672164

Predicting the long-term effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on mortality from baseline variables and the early response a report from the CARE-HF (Cardiac Resynchronization in Heart Failure) Trial.

John Cleland1, Nick Freemantle, Stefano Ghio, Friedrich Fruhwald, Aparna Shankar, Monique Marijanowski, Yves Verboven, Luigi Tavazzi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to investigate whether selected baseline variables and early response markers predict the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on long-term mortality.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy reduces long-term morbidity and mortality in patients with moderate or severe heart failure and markers of cardiac dyssynchrony, but not all patients respond to a similar extent.
METHODS: In the CARE-HF (Cardiac Resynchronization in Heart Failure) study, 813 patients with heart failure and markers of cardiac dyssynchrony were randomly assigned to receive or not receive CRT in addition to pharmacological treatment and were followed for a median of 37.6 months. A model including assigned treatment, 15 pre-specified baseline variables, and 8 markers of response at 3 months was constructed to predict all-cause mortality.
RESULTS: On multivariable analysis, plasma concentration of amino terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (univariate and multivariable model chi-square test: 105.0 and 48.4; both p < 0.0001) and severity of mitral regurgitation (chi-square test: 44.0 and 17.9; both p < 0.0001) at 3 months, regardless of assigned treatment, were the strongest predictors of mortality. Ischemic heart disease as the cause of ventricular dysfunction (chi-square test: 34.9 and 7.4; p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0066), being in New York Heart Association functional class IV (chi-square test: 18.8 and 9.6; p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0020), or having less interventricular mechanical delay (chi-square test: 29.8 and 8.8; p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0029) at baseline all predicted a worse outcome. However, the reduction in mortality in patients assigned to CRT was similar before (hazard ratio: 0.602; 95% confidence interval: 0.468 to 0.774) and after (hazard ratio: 0.679; 95% confidence interval: 0.494 to 0.914) adjustment for variables measured at baseline and at 3 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who have more severe mitral regurgitation or persistently elevated amino terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide despite treatment for heart failure, including CRT, have a higher mortality. However, patients assigned to CRT had a lower mortality even after adjusting for variables measured before and 3 months after intervention. The effect of CRT on mortality cannot be usefully predicted using such information. (CARE-HF CArdiac Resynchronization in Heart Failure; NCT00170300).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18672164     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.04.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  38 in total

Review 1.  Current role of echocardiography in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Donato Mele; Matteo Bertini; Michele Malagù; Marianna Nardozza; Roberto Ferrari
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 2.  Role of cardiac MRI and nuclear imaging in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Niti R Aggarwal; Matthew W Martinez; Bernard J Gersh; Panithaya Chareonthaitawee
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 3.  Non-response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  Syed Yaseen Naqvi; Anas Jawaid; Ilan Goldenberg; Valentina Kutyifa
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2018-10

Review 4.  Clinical, laboratory, and pacing predictors of CRT response.

Authors:  Jagdesh Kandala; Robert K Altman; Mi Young Park; Jagmeet P Singh
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  One-year outcome after CRT implantation in NYHA class IV in comparison to NYHA class III patients.

Authors:  Andreas Schuchert; Carmine Muto; Themistoklis Maounis; Robert Frank; Rita Omega Ella; Alexander Polauck; Luigi Padeletti
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-31       Impact factor: 5.460

6.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy update: evolving indications, expanding benefit?

Authors:  C Butcher; Y Mareev; V Markides; M Mason; T Wong; J G F Cleland
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Novel Heart Failure Biomarkers Predict Improvement of Mitral Regurgitation in Patients Receiving Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-The BIOCRT Study.

Authors:  Jonathan Beaudoin; Jagmeet P Singh; Jackie Szymonifka; Qing Zhou; Robert A Levine; James L Januzzi; Quynh A Truong
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 8.  Natriuretic peptides in heart failure: should therapy be guided by BNP levels?

Authors:  Michelle O'Donoghue; Eugene Braunwald
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 32.419

9.  Left Ventricular Dyssynchrony After Acute Myocardial Infarction is a Powerful Indicator of Left Ventricular Remodeling.

Authors:  Jum Suk Ko; Myung Ho Jeong; Min Goo Lee; Shin Eun Lee; Won Yu Kang; Soo Hyun Kim; Keun-Ho Park; Doo Sun Sim; Nam Sik Yoon; Hyun Ju Yoon; Young Joon Hong; Hyung Wook Park; Ju Han Kim; Youngkeun Ahn; Jeong Gwan Cho; Jong Chun Park; Jung Chaee Kang
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.243

Review 10.  What is treatment success in cardiac resynchronization therapy?

Authors:  Paul W X Foley; Francisco Leyva; Michael P Frenneaux
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.