Literature DB >> 1867182

Effectiveness of renal fellowship training for subsequent clinical practice.

P L Kimmel1, J P Bosch.   

Abstract

To assess whether nephrologists perceive disparities between the skills learned during fellowship training and those necessary for clinical subspecialty practice, we surveyed the perception of board-certified American nephrologists regarding the effectiveness of their clinical training. A questionnaire was sent to all Diplomates of the American Board of Internal Medicine in the subspecialty of Nephrology who successfully passed the qualifying examination in 1974, 1980, and 1986, regarding the effectiveness of academic instruction within the clinical fellowship program as regards traditional academic subject matter, patient management, performance of procedures, and interpretation of laboratory data. Questionnaires were returned by 42.1%. Although respondents were generally satisfied with training in academic nephrologic subject matter, dissatisfaction with training in pediatric nephrology, transplant immunology, nephrolithiasis, nutrition, and renal function and disease in pregnancy was evident. Training was thought to be ineffective in theoretical and practical aspects of management of end-stage renal disease. In addition, respondents were dissatisfied with the effectiveness of their training in interpretation of radiologic tests and procedures such as gaining access to the circulation. More recently trained nephrologists were dissatisfied with training in outpatient management and interpretation of radiographic tests. Differences between perceptions of older and younger nephrologists were most marked regarding their preparation for gaining access to the circulation, interpretation of intravenous pyelography, and training for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). To prepare fellows in training for the exigencies of clinical practice. Nephrology training programs will have to emphasize the teaching of the cognitive and manual bases of performing procedures, and provide more outpatient experience for trainees.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1867182     DOI: 10.1016/s0272-6386(12)80886-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  5 in total

1.  Performance of procedures by nephrologists and nephrology fellows at U.S. nephrology training programs.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Berns; W Charles O'Neill
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Education in Nephrology Fellowship: A Survey-Based Needs Assessment.

Authors:  Robert W Rope; Kurtis A Pivert; Mark G Parker; Stephen M Sozio; Sylvia Bereknyei Merell
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 10.121

3.  A survey-based evaluation of self-perceived competency after nephrology fellowship training.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Berns
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  A Spanish multicentric study to evaluate the clinical activity of nephrology fellows during in-hospital on-call shifts.

Authors:  David Arroyo; Patricia Dominguez; Nayara Panizo; Borja Quiroga; Marta Calvo; Laura Álvarez; Nicolás Macias; David Menendez; Luis Blazquez; Isabel Galan; Javier Reque
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2013-08-01

5.  Interventional nephrology: current status and clinical impact in Japan.

Authors:  Masato Ikeda; Hiroyuki Terawaki; Eiichiro Kanda; Maiko Furuya; Yudo Tanno; Masatsugu Nakao; Yukio Maruyama; Masutaka Maeda; Chieko Higuchi; Tsutomu Sakurada; Tomohiro Kaneko; Hiroaki Io; Koji Hashimoto; Atsushi Ueda; Keita Hirano; Naoki Washida; Hiraku Yoshida; Kazuhiro Yoshikawa; Yoshihiro Taniyama; Kenji Harada; Nanae Matsuo; Ichiro Okido; Takashi Yokoo
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.801

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.