Literature DB >> 18671785

Comparison of potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate: update of a prospective non-randomized two-centre study.

Robin Ruszat1, Stephen F Wyler, Michael Seitz, Kurt Lehmann, Constanze Abe, Gernot Bonkat, Oliver Reich, Thomas C Gasser, Alexander Bachmann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the intermediate-term clinical efficacy and the rate of complications in 80 W photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) with the potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser (Greenlight, (AMS, Minnetonka, MN, USA) compared with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in a prospective non-randomised two-centre study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From December 2003 to August 2006, 396 patients (PVP 269, TURP 127) with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia were included in the study. There was a significant difference in mean age (72 years for PVP vs 68 for TURP, P = 0.001). Patients were therefore stratified in age categories (<70, 70-80, >80 years) and compared for perioperative variables, functional outcome and complications, with a follow-up of up to 24 months.
RESULTS: The mean prostate size was greater (overall, 62 vs 48 mL, P < 0.001) and mean operative duration longer (overall 72 vs 53 min; P = 0.001) for PVP in all age categories. The rate of intraoperative bleeding (3% vs 11%), blood transfusions (0% vs 5.5%) and capsule perforations (0.4% vs 6.3%), and early postoperative clot retention (0.4% vs 3.9%) was significantly lower for PVP. Hospitalization time was significantly shorter in the PVP group for patients aged <70 years (3.0 vs 4.7 days) and 70-80 years (4.0 vs 5.0 days; P = 0.001). The improvement of peak urinary flow rate was higher after TURP for any age category. The International Prostate Symptom Score and postvoid residual volume during the follow-up showed no significant difference. After 12 months the overall prostate size reduction was 63% (-30 mL) after TURP and 44% (-27 mL) after PVP. The rate of repeat TURP/PVP was higher in the PVP group (6.7% vs 3.9%, not significant) within the follow-up of up to 2 years. The incidence of urethral and bladder neck strictures was comparable.
CONCLUSIONS: PVP was more favourable in terms of perioperative safety. Although patients assigned for PVP were older and had larger prostates, PVP resulted in a similar functional outcome. Further follow-up is needed to draw final conclusions about the long-term efficacy of PVP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18671785     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07905.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  31 in total

1.  New techniques for laser prostatectomy: an update.

Authors:  Doreen E Chung; Alexis E Te
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2009-06

2.  A rare but serious complication of GreenLight HPS photoselective vaporization of the prostate: Prostatic capsular perforation with bilateral thigh urinomas and osteitis pubis.

Authors:  David Harriman; Brian E Mayson; Ercole F Leone
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Laser prostatectomy: holmium laser enucleation and photoselective laser vaporization of the prostate.

Authors:  Yakup Bostanci; Amir Kazzazi; Bob Djavan
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2013

4.  Effectiveness of medical and surgical therapies for lower urinary tract symptoms in the community setting.

Authors:  Amy E Krambeck; Debra J Jacobson; Michaela E McGree; Deborah J Lightner; Michael M Lieber; Steven J Jacobsen; Jennifer L St Sauver
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  The application of 120-W high-performance system GreenLight laser vaporization of the prostate in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Wei Tao; BoXin Xue; Yachen Zang; ChuanYang Sun; Dongrong Yang; Yuanyuan Zhang; YuXi Shan
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.161

6.  Overview of interventional treatment options for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Mostafa M Elhilali
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 7.  Complications of laser prostatectomy: a review of recent data.

Authors:  Malte Rieken; Nicole Ebinger Mundorff; Gernot Bonkat; Stephen Wyler; Alexander Bachmann
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Photoselective green-light laser vaporisation vs. TURP for BPH: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hui Ding; Wan Du; Ze-Ping Lu; Zhen-Xing Zhai; Han-Zhang Wang; Zhi-Ping Wang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.285

9.  Changes in Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels after Potassium-Titanyl-Phosphate (KTP) Laser Vaporization of the Prostate.

Authors:  Myungsun Shim; Taekmin Kwon; Seong Chul Kim; Seong-Heon Ha; Tai Young Ahn
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-02-18

10.  Against the motion: Lasers are superfluous for the surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia in the developing world.

Authors:  Anil Varshney; Anshuman Agarwal
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2009-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.