Literature DB >> 18670356

Ultrastaging improves detection of metastases in sentinel lymph nodes of uterine cervix squamous cell carcinoma.

Elizabeth D Euscher1, Anais Malpica, Edward Neely Atkinson, Charles F Levenback, Michael Frumovitz, Michael T Deavers.   

Abstract

The technique of sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection is increasingly being applied in patients with uterine cervix carcinoma. This study presents the pathologic findings of SLNs in 48 such patients. The institutional pathology files were searched for all patients with a diagnosis of cervical squamous cell carcinoma who had SLNs reported. Patient age, follow-up, tumor size, presence/absence of lymphatic invasion, number and status of SLNs and non-SLNs, location of SLNs, and size of metastases in SLNs were recorded. All SLNs were sectioned in 2-mm slices perpendicular to the long axis and submitted entirely for microscopic examination. For all SLNs negative on the initial hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides, an ultrastaging protocol was performed consisting of 5 sets of slides at 40-mum intervals (1 H&E slide+2 unstained slides), representing an additional 5 intervals. Lymph nodes negative by the additional H&E intervals had immunohistochemistry for cytokeratin performed on 1 unstained slide. Forty-eight patients ranging from 25 to 62 years of age had a total of 208 SLNs removed. Fifteen (31%) patients had positive SLNs with 1 to 5 positive SLNs per case. The metastasis size ranged from a single cell to 27 mm. Twelve patients had metastasis detected by routine processing in 23 SLNs, whereas ultrastaging detected metastases in 3 SLNs of 3 additional patients. In 2 patients with metastasis detected by ultrastaging, the metastasis was detected by wide H&E intervals (level 2 for 1 patient; level 3 for 1 patient); in 1 patient, the metastasis was detected only by immunohistochemistry and consisted of a single cell. Of the 15 patients with positive SLNs, 3 patients had a total of 6 positive non-SLNs. All of the patients with a positive SLN are currently living. Thirty-three (69%) patients had negative SLNs. Of these, 1 patient had a single positive non-SLN for a false negative rate of 6.25%. Negative SLN predicts negative non-SLN. For most patients with a positive SLN, the SLN will be the only metastasis detected; a minority of patients with a positive SLN may have a positive non-SLN.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18670356     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31816ecfe4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  16 in total

1.  Sensitivity and negative predictive value for sentinel lymph node biopsy in women with early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Gloria Salvo; Pedro T Ramirez; Charles F Levenback; Mark F Munsell; Elizabeth D Euscher; Pamela T Soliman; Michael Frumovitz
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  [S3 guidelines on diagnostics and treatment of cervical cancer: Demands on pathology].

Authors:  L-C Horn; M W Beckmann; M Follmann; M C Koch; P Mallmann; S Marnitz; D Schmidt
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Establishing a sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm for the treatment of early cervical cancer.

Authors:  Beatrice Cormier; John P Diaz; Karin Shih; Rachael M Sampson; Yukio Sonoda; Kay J Park; Khaled Alektiar; Dennis S Chi; Richard R Barakat; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  The EANM clinical and technical guidelines for lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node localization in gynaecological cancers.

Authors:  Francesco Giammarile; M Fani Bozkurt; David Cibula; Jaume Pahisa; Wim J Oyen; Pilar Paredes; Renato Valdes Olmos; Sergi Vidal Sicart
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Rate of para-aortic lymph node micrometastasis in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Behrouz Zand; Elizabeth D Euscher; Pamela T Soliman; Kathleen M Schmeler; Robert L Coleman; Michael Frumovitz; Anuja Jhingran; Lois M Ramondetta; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 6.  [Revised German guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of carcinoma of the uterine cervix-what's new for pathologists in 2021?]

Authors:  Lars-Christian Horn; Matthias W Beckmann; Markus Follmann; Martin C Koch; Monika Nothacker; Birgit Pöschel; Frederik Stübs; Dietmar Schmidt; Anne Kathrin Höhn
Journal:  Pathologie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-02-21

7.  "Triple injection" lymphatic mapping technique to determine if parametrial nodes are the true sentinel lymph nodes in women with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Michael Frumovitz; Elizabeth D Euscher; Michael T Deavers; Pamela T Soliman; Kathleen M Schmeler; Pedro T Ramirez; Charles F Levenback
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Prognostic value of HPV-mRNA in sentinel lymph nodes of cervical cancer patients with pN0-status.

Authors:  Matthias Dürst; Heike Hoyer; Christoph Altgassen; Christiane Greinke; Norman Häfner; Alba Fishta; Mieczyslaw Gajda; Ute Mahnert; Peter Hillemanns; Thomas Dimpfl; Miriam Lenhard; K Ulrich Petry; Ingo B Runnebaum; Achim Schneider
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-09-08

Review 9.  Ultrastaging of lymph node in uterine cancers.

Authors:  Corinne Bézu; Charles Coutant; Marcos Ballester; Jean-Guillaume Feron; Roman Rouzier; Serge Uzan; Emile Daraï
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-01-21

Review 10.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy in uterine cervical cancer patients: ready for clinical use? A review of the literature.

Authors:  Viktoria-Varvara Palla; Georgios Karaolanis; Demetrios Moris; Aristides Antsaklis
Journal:  ISRN Surg       Date:  2014-01-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.