BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Clinical application of continuous autoregulation monitoring would benefit from a comparison of curves generated by online monitoring with standard autoregulation curves in animal models. We characterized the accuracy of 3 continuous monitors of autoregulation in a piglet model of hypotension. METHODS: Piglets 5 to10 days old with intracranial pressure (ICP) at naïve or elevated (20 mm Hg) levels had gradual arterial hypotension induced by a balloon catheter in the inferior vena cava. Elevated ICP was maintained by a continuous infusion of artificial cerebrospinal fluid. Three indices of autoregulation were simultaneously and continuously calculated. A moving, linear Pearson's coefficient between spontaneous slow waves of cerebral perfusion pressure and slow waves of laser-Doppler flux or cortical oxygenation rendered the laser-Doppler index and cerebral-oximetry index, respectively. Similar correlation between slow waves of arterial blood pressure and ICP rendered the pressure-reactivity index. The lower limit of autoregulation was determined directly for each animal by plotting laser-Doppler cortical red blood cell flux as a function of cerebral perfusion pressure. Receiver-operator characteristics were determined for the 3 indices. RESULTS: The areas under the receiver-operator characteristics curves for discriminating the individual lower limit of autoregulation at low and high ICP were 0.89 and 0.85 for the laser-Doppler index, 0.89 and 0.84 for the cerebral-oximetry index, and 0.79 and 0.79 for the pressure-reactivity index. The pressure-reactivity index performed equally well at low and high ICPs. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous monitoring of autoregulation by spontaneous slow waves of cerebral perfusion pressure can accurately detect loss of autoregulation due to hypotension in piglets by all 3 modalities.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Clinical application of continuous autoregulation monitoring would benefit from a comparison of curves generated by online monitoring with standard autoregulation curves in animal models. We characterized the accuracy of 3 continuous monitors of autoregulation in a piglet model of hypotension. METHODS: Piglets 5 to10 days old with intracranial pressure (ICP) at naïve or elevated (20 mm Hg) levels had gradual arterial hypotension induced by a balloon catheter in the inferior vena cava. Elevated ICP was maintained by a continuous infusion of artificial cerebrospinal fluid. Three indices of autoregulation were simultaneously and continuously calculated. A moving, linear Pearson's coefficient between spontaneous slow waves of cerebral perfusion pressure and slow waves of laser-Doppler flux or cortical oxygenation rendered the laser-Doppler index and cerebral-oximetry index, respectively. Similar correlation between slow waves of arterial blood pressure and ICP rendered the pressure-reactivity index. The lower limit of autoregulation was determined directly for each animal by plotting laser-Doppler cortical red blood cell flux as a function of cerebral perfusion pressure. Receiver-operator characteristics were determined for the 3 indices. RESULTS: The areas under the receiver-operator characteristics curves for discriminating the individual lower limit of autoregulation at low and high ICP were 0.89 and 0.85 for the laser-Doppler index, 0.89 and 0.84 for the cerebral-oximetry index, and 0.79 and 0.79 for the pressure-reactivity index. The pressure-reactivity index performed equally well at low and high ICPs. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous monitoring of autoregulation by spontaneous slow waves of cerebral perfusion pressure can accurately detect loss of autoregulation due to hypotension in piglets by all 3 modalities.
Authors: Magdalena Hiler; Marek Czosnyka; Peter Hutchinson; Marcella Balestreri; Peter Smielewski; Basil Matta; John D Pickard Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Luzius A Steiner; Jonathan P Coles; Andrew J Johnston; Doris A Chatfield; Peter Smielewski; Tim D Fryer; Franklin I Aigbirhio; John C Clark; John D Pickard; David K Menon; Marek Czosnyka Journal: Stroke Date: 2003-08-28 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Jennifer K Lee; Zeng-Jin Yang; Bing Wang; Abby C Larson; Jessica L Jamrogowicz; Ewa Kulikowicz; Kathleen K Kibler; Jennifer O Mytar; Erin L Carter; Hillary T Burman; Ken M Brady; Peter Smielewski; Marek Czosnyka; Raymond C Koehler; Donald H Shaffner Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2012-02-07 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Frederick A Zeiler; François Mathieu; Miguel Monteiro; Ben Glocker; Ari Ercole; Erta Beqiri; Manuel Cabeleira; Nino Stocchetti; Peter Smielewski; Marek Czosnyka; Virginia Newcombe; David K Menon Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2020-04-06 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Paul Pham; Jessica Bindra; Anders Aneman; Alwin Chuan; John M Worthington; Matthias Jaeger Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Christopher J Rhee; Cristine Sortica da Costa; Topun Austin; Ken M Brady; Marek Czosnyka; Jennifer K Lee Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2018-09-08 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Matthias Reinhard; Florian Neunhoeffer; Thomas A Gerds; Wolf-Dirk Niesen; Klaus-Juergen Buttler; Jens Timmer; Bernhard Schmidt; Marek Czosnyka; Cornelius Weiller; Andreas Hetzel Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-10-17 Impact factor: 17.440