Literature DB >> 18669713

Modified Ritgen's maneuver for anal sphincter injury at delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

Eva Rubin Jönsson1, Ibtesam Elfaghi, Håkan Rydhström, Andreas Herbst.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether Ritgen's maneuver decreases the risk of third- to fourth-degree perineal tears compared with simple perineal support.
METHODS: A total of 1,623 nulliparous women in term labor, singleton pregnancy, and cephalic presentation were randomly assigned to Ritgen's maneuver or standard care. Ritgen's maneuver denotes extracting the fetal head, using one hand to pull the fetal chin from between the maternal anus and the coccyx, and the other on the fetal occiput to control speed of delivery. Ritgen's maneuver was performed during a uterine contraction, rather than, as originally recommended, between contractions. Our standard care entailed perineal support with one hand and control of the speed of crowning with the other, and use of Ritgen's maneuver only on specific indications. Women delivered by cesarean delivery (n=10) or instrumentally (n=142) were excluded, as well as 39 erroneously included women (parous or in preterm labor), six inaccurately assigned participants, one with missing data, and two participants who withdrew consent. For the remaining 1,423 women, the result was analyzed according to intention to treat.
RESULTS: Ritgen's maneuver was performed in 554 (79.6%) of 696 women randomly assigned to this procedure and in 31 (4.3%) of 727 women randomly assigned to simple perineal support. The rate of third- to fourth-degree tears was 5.5% (n=38) in women assigned to Ritgen's maneuver and 4.4% (n=32) in those assigned to simple perineal support (relative risk 1.24; 95% confidence interval 0.78-1.96).
CONCLUSION: Ritgen's maneuver does not decrease the risk of anal sphincter injury at delivery, at least not when performed during a contraction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18669713     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31817f2867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  6 in total

Review 1.  Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma.

Authors:  Vigdis Aasheim; Anne Britt Vika Nilsen; Liv Merete Reinar; Mirjam Lukasse
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-13

2.  The effect of perineal control with hands-on and hand-poised methods on perineal trauma and delivery outcome.

Authors:  Azam Foroughipour; Farah Firuzeh; Ataolah Ghahiri; Vajihe Norbakhsh; Tayebeh Heidari
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.852

3.  Risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury increases with maternal age irrespective of parity: a population-based register study.

Authors:  Ulla Waldenström; Cecilia Ekéus
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Active delivery of the anterior arm and incidence of second-degree perineal tears: a clinical practice evaluation.

Authors:  Nicolas Mottet; Marine Bonneaud; Astrid Eckman-Lacroix; Rajeev Ramanah; Didier Riethmuller
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries after training to protect the perineum: cohort study.

Authors:  Katariina Laine; Finn Egil Skjeldestad; Leiv Sandvik; Anne Cathrine Staff
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Cutting a mediolateral episiotomy at the correct angle: evaluation of a new device, the Episcissors-60.

Authors:  R M Freeman; H J Hollands; L F Barron; D S Kapoor
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2014-02-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.