Literature DB >> 18669663

The discovery of structural form.

Charles Kemp1, Joshua B Tenenbaum.   

Abstract

Algorithms for finding structure in data have become increasingly important both as tools for scientific data analysis and as models of human learning, yet they suffer from a critical limitation. Scientists discover qualitatively new forms of structure in observed data: For instance, Linnaeus recognized the hierarchical organization of biological species, and Mendeleev recognized the periodic structure of the chemical elements. Analogous insights play a pivotal role in cognitive development: Children discover that object category labels can be organized into hierarchies, friendship networks are organized into cliques, and comparative relations (e.g., "bigger than" or "better than") respect a transitive order. Standard algorithms, however, can only learn structures of a single form that must be specified in advance: For instance, algorithms for hierarchical clustering create tree structures, whereas algorithms for dimensionality-reduction create low-dimensional spaces. Here, we present a computational model that learns structures of many different forms and that discovers which form is best for a given dataset. The model makes probabilistic inferences over a space of graph grammars representing trees, linear orders, multidimensional spaces, rings, dominance hierarchies, cliques, and other forms and successfully discovers the underlying structure of a variety of physical, biological, and social domains. Our approach brings structure learning methods closer to human abilities and may lead to a deeper computational understanding of cognitive development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18669663      PMCID: PMC2492756          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0802631105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  10 in total

1.  To Matrix, Network, or Hierarchy: That Is the Question.

Authors:  L R Novick; S M Hurley
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  J P Huelsenbeck; F Ronquist
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 3.  Community structure in social and biological networks.

Authors:  M Girvan; M E J Newman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  An informal history of the interpersonal circumplex tradition.

Authors:  J S Wiggins
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  1996-04

5.  Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning.

Authors:  Joshua B Tenenbaum; Thomas L Griffiths; Charles Kemp
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Multidimensional scaling, tree-fitting, and clustering.

Authors:  R N Shepard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-10-24       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Multidimensional scaling of similarity.

Authors:  W S Torgerson
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 8.  Folk biology and the anthropology of science: cognitive universals and cultural particulars.

Authors:  S Atran
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 12.579

9.  Familiarity and dominance relations among female sooty mangabeys in the Taï National Park.

Authors:  Friederike Range; Ronald Noë
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.371

Review 10.  The four elementary forms of sociality: framework for a unified theory of social relations.

Authors:  A P Fiske
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 8.934

  10 in total
  70 in total

1.  Induction as model selection.

Authors:  Keith J Holyoak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Navigating complex decision spaces: Problems and paradigms in sequential choice.

Authors:  Matthew M Walsh; John R Anderson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Neural Evidence for the Prediction of Animacy Features during Language Comprehension: Evidence from MEG and EEG Representational Similarity Analysis.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Edward Wlotko; Edward Alexander; Lotte Schoot; Minjae Kim; Lena Warnke; Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The construction of semantic memory: grammar-based representations learned from relational episodic information.

Authors:  Francesco P Battaglia; Cyriel M A Pennartz
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 2.380

5.  A mathematical theory of semantic development in deep neural networks.

Authors:  Andrew M Saxe; James L McClelland; Surya Ganguli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Multiscale Community Blockmodel for Network Exploration.

Authors:  Qirong Ho; Ankur P Parikh; Eric P Xing
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 5.033

7.  A role for the developing lexicon in phonetic category acquisition.

Authors:  Naomi H Feldman; Thomas L Griffiths; Sharon Goldwater; James L Morgan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Brain reading and behavioral methods provide complementary perspectives on the representation of concepts.

Authors:  Andrew James Bauer; Marcel Adam Just
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Structure learning in a sensorimotor association task.

Authors:  Daniel A Braun; Stephan Waldert; Ad Aertsen; Daniel M Wolpert; Carsten Mehring
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Structure learning in action.

Authors:  Daniel A Braun; Carsten Mehring; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.