Literature DB >> 1866961

Walking after spinal cord injury. Goal or wish?

J V Subbarao1.   

Abstract

Less than a third of patients walk again after a spinal cord injury, whereas every one of them wants to try. Residual function, energy expenditure, the extent of orthotic support needed, and patient motivation will determine the outcome. Functional electrical stimulation and other new orthotic designs have not notably increased the number of persons able to walk after a spinal injury. Rehabilitation professionals can use patient education, illustrating relearning to walk with examples of infants' and toddlers' progress, to assist patients in understanding their abilities and limitations. The final decision on ambulation and orthotic prescriptions can be made in stages after a patient adjusts to a wheelchair-independent level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1866961      PMCID: PMC1002844     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN: 0093-0415


  19 in total

1.  Energy requirements in paraplegic ambulation.

Authors:  E E GORDON; H VANDERWALDE
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1956-05       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 2.  Electrical muscle stimulation in combination with a reciprocating gait orthosis for ambulation by paraplegics.

Authors:  C A Phillips
Journal:  J Biomed Eng       Date:  1989-07

Review 3.  Rehabilitation technology for standing and walking after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  R J Jaeger; G M Yarkony; E J Roth
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 2.159

4.  Determinants of gait performance following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  R L Waters; J S Yakura; R Adkins; G Barnes
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Early prognostic factors for walking in spinal cord injuries.

Authors:  P Daverat; M C Sibrac; J F Dartigues; J M Mazaux; E Marit; X Debelleix; M Barat
Journal:  Paraplegia       Date:  1988-08

6.  Spinal cord injury: requirements for ambulation.

Authors:  R W Hussey; E S Stauffer
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  A reappraisal of braces and other mechanical aids in patients with spinal cord dysfunction: results of a follow-up study.

Authors:  L I Kaplan; B B Grynbaum; H A Rusk; T Anastasia; S Gassler
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Energy expenditure of ambulation in paraplegics: effects of long term use of bracing.

Authors:  A Chantraine; J M Crielaard; A Onkelinx; F Pirnay
Journal:  Paraplegia       Date:  1984-06

9.  Energy costs of walking and standing with functional neuromuscular stimulation and long leg braces.

Authors:  E B Marsolais; B G Edwards
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Spinal cord dysfunction in older patients--rehabilitation outcomes.

Authors:  J V Subbarao; B A Nemchausky; J J Niekelski; R C Fruin; M Gratzer
Journal:  J Am Paraplegia Soc       Date:  1987 Jul-Oct
View more
  2 in total

1.  Factors related to obstacle crossing in independent ambulatory patients with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Sugalya Amatachaya; Thiwaporn Thaweewannakij; Jutarat Adirek-udomrat; Wantana Siritaratiwat
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Co-contraction of ankle muscle activity during quiet standing in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury is associated with postural instability.

Authors:  Kai Lon Fok; Jae W Lee; Janelle Unger; Katherine Chan; Kristin E Musselman; Kei Masani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.