Literature DB >> 1866850

Renal cell carcinoma in young and old patients. Comparison of prognostic pathologic variables (cell type, tumor grade and stage, and DNA ploidy pattern) and their impact on disease outcome.

L M Rainwater1, H Zincke, G M Farrow, N J Gonchoroff.   

Abstract

A group of 41 young patients (age less than or equal to 40 years; mean, 35.7 years) and a group of 34 old patients (age greater than or equal to 80 years; mean, 82.4 years) who underwent operation for renal cell carcinoma between 1970 and 1986 were compared. Sex, grade, and DNA ploidy pattern distributions were similar between the groups. Granular cell and papillary cancers with lower stages at presentation were more common among the young. In patients with high-stage disease, 73 percent of the older group but none of the younger had DNA diploid tumors. Low-stage clear cell carcinoma caused cancer death only in the young. Stage I nondiploid clear cell carcinomas were associated with death (33%) only in the young. Overall, death rates seem similar for both groups but among the young most (63%) occurred with low-stage disease and a nondiploid pattern only; among the old, 88 percent occurred with high-stage disease and independent of DNA ploidy pattern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1866850     DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(91)80002-o

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  7 in total

Review 1.  Systemic therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in older adults.

Authors:  Sumanta K Pal; Ari Vanderwalde; Arti Hurria; Robert A Figlin
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  Histopathology of surgically treated renal tumours in young adults: a developing country perspective.

Authors:  Muhammed Mubarak; Javed I Kazi; Rehan Mohsin; Altaf Hashmi; Syed Ali Anwer Naqvi; Syed Adeeb Ul Hassan Rizvi
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 3.  Biology of metastasis and its clinical implications: renal-cell cancer.

Authors:  J C Ulchaker; E A Klein
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Efficacy of targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the elderly patient population.

Authors:  Husain K Khambati; Toni K Choueiri; Christian K Kollmannsberger; Scott North; George A Bjarnason; Ulka N Vaishampayan; Lori Wood; Jennifer J Knox; Min-Han Tan; Mary J MacKenzie; Frede Donskov; Brian I Rini; Daniel Y C Heng
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.872

5.  Clinicopathologic features of renal cell carcinoma in young adults: a comparison study with renal cell carcinoma in older patients.

Authors:  Jae Hee Suh; Tina Oak; Jae Y Ro; Luan D Truong; Alberto G Ayala; Steven S Shen
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2009-01-30

6.  Renal cell carcinoma in young and old patients--is there a difference?

Authors:  R Houston Thompson; Maria A Ordonez; Alexia Iasonos; Fernando P Secin; Bertrand Guillonneau; Paul Russo; Karim Touijer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Sporadic renal cell carcinoma in young and elderly patients: are there different clinicopathological features and disease specific survival rates?

Authors:  Stefan Denzinger; Wolfgang Otto; Maximilian Burger; Christine Hammerschmied; Kerstin Junker; Arndt Hartmann; Wolf F Wieland; Bernhard Walter
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-02-05       Impact factor: 2.754

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.