Literature DB >> 18668341

A new minimum fluorescence parameter, as generated using pulse frequency modulation, compared with pulse amplitude modulation: Falpha versus Fo.

A Harrison Wright1, John M DeLong, Jeffrey L Franklin, Rajasekaran R Lada, Robert K Prange.   

Abstract

The minimum fluorescence parameter (Falpha), generated using the new pulse frequency modulation (PFM) technology, was compared with the minimum fluorescence parameter (Fo), generated by pulse amplitude modulation (PAM), in response to a reversible low-oxygen stress in 'Honeycrisp'trade mark (HC) apples (Malus domestica) and an irreversible osmotic stress induced by water loss in two grape (Vitis spp.) cultivars ('L'Acadie' (LAc) and 'Thompson Seedless' (TS)). The minimum fluorescence values produced by both fluorometer types in response to a reversible low-oxygen stress in apples were indistinguishable: both Fo and Falpha increased when O2 levels were lowered below the anaerobic compensation point (ACP); when gas levels returned to normoxia both parameters dipped below, then returned to, the original fluorescence baseline. The two parameters also responded similarly to the irreversible osmotic stress in grapes: in both cultivars, Falpha and Fo first decreased before reaching an inflection point at approximately 20% mass loss and then increased towards a second inflection point. However, the two parameters were not analogous under the irreversible osmotic stress; most notably, the relative Falpha values appeared to be lower than Fo during the later stages of dehydration. This was likely due to the influence of the Fm parameter and an overestimation of Falpha when measuring the fluorescence from healthy and responsive chloroplasts as found in grapes experiencing minimal water loss, but not in grapes undergoing moderate to severe dehydration. An examination of the data during a typical PFM scan reveals this fluorometer system may yield new fluorescence information with interesting biological applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18668341     DOI: 10.1007/s11120-008-9313-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photosynth Res        ISSN: 0166-8595            Impact factor:   3.573


  1 in total

1.  The use of chlorophyll fluorescence nomenclature in plant stress physiology.

Authors:  O van Kooten; J F Snel
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.573

  1 in total
  1 in total

1.  The interrelationship between the lower oxygen limit, chlorophyll fluorescence and the xanthophyll cycle in plants.

Authors:  A Harrison Wright; John M DeLong; Arunika H L A N Gunawardena; Robert K Prange
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 3.573

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.