Literature DB >> 18667897

Enhancing evaluation in an undergraduate medical education program.

Kathryn A Gibson1, Patrick Boyle, Deborah A Black, Margaret Cunningham, Michael C Grimm, H Patrick McNeil.   

Abstract

Approaches to evaluation of medical student teaching programs have historically incorporated a range of methods and have had variable effectiveness. Such approaches are rarely comprehensive, typically evaluating only a component rather than the whole program, and are often episodic rather than continuous. There are growing pressures for significant improvement in academic program evaluation. The authors describe an initiative that arose after a radical reorganization of the undergraduate medical education program at the University of New South Wales in part in response to feedback from the accrediting authority. The aim was to design a comprehensive, multicomponent, program-wide evaluation and improvement system. The framework envisages the quality of the program as comprising four main aspects: curriculum and resources; staff and teaching; student experience; and student and graduate outcomes. Key principles of the adopted approach include the views that both student and staff experiences provide valuable information; that measurement of student and graduate outcomes are needed; that an emphasis on action after evaluation is critical (closing the loop); that the strategies and processes need to be continual rather than episodic; and that evaluation should be used to recognize, report on, and reward excellence in teaching. In addition, an important philosophy adopted was that teachers, course coordinators, and administrators should undertake evaluation and improvement activities as an inherent part of teaching, rather than viewing evaluation as something that is externally managed. Examples of the strategy in action, which provide initial evidence of validation for this approach, are described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18667897     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31817eb8ab

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  17 in total

1.  Use of an institutional template for annual program evaluation and improvement: benefits for program participation and performance.

Authors:  Kathryn M Andolsek; Alisa Nagler; John L Weinerth
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2010-06

2.  [Making innovation in teaching measurable : Psychometric validation of the "Radio-Prak": a questionnaire using the example of a clinical practical seminar in interventional radiology].

Authors:  J Bartels; J Backhaus; R Kickuth; F Fluck; S König; A Augustin
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  [Digital teaching in pathology: experiences from Mainz].

Authors:  Beate K Straub; Tiemo S Gerber; Holger Buggenhagen; Bettina Jäger; Clemens Sommer; Wilfried Roth
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 1.011

4.  InspirE5: a participatory, internationally informed framework for health humanities curricula in health professions education.

Authors:  Sandra E Carr; Anna Harris; Karen Scott; Mary Ani-Amponsah; Claire Hooker; Brid Phillips; Farah Noya; Nahal Mavaddat; Daniel M Vuillermin; Steve Reid; Pamela Brett-MacLean
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.263

5.  Program Evaluation in Medical Education: An Overview of the Utilization-focused Approach.

Authors:  Matt Vassar; Denna L Wheeler; Machelle Davison; Johnathan Franklin
Journal:  J Educ Eval Health Prof       Date:  2010-06-15

6.  Making medical student course evaluations meaningful: implementation of an intensive course review protocol.

Authors:  Patrick Fleming; Olga Heath; Alan Goodridge; Vernon Curran
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Trialing a new clinical clerkship record in Japanese clinical training.

Authors:  Shosaku Nomura; Noboru Tanigawa; Yo Kinoshita; Koichi Tomoda
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2015-09-22

8.  A pilot Tuning Project-based national study on recently graduated medical students' self-assessment of competences--the TEST study.

Authors:  Pedro Grilo Diogo; Joselina Barbosa; Maria Amélia Ferreira
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 9.  Evaluation in medical education: A topical review of target parameters, data collection tools and confounding factors.

Authors:  Sarah Schiekirka; Markus A Feufel; Christoph Herrmann-Lingen; Tobias Raupach
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2015-09-16

10.  Improving the transition from medical school to internship - evaluation of a preparation for internship course.

Authors:  Helen A Scicluna; Michael C Grimm; Philip D Jones; Louis S Pilotto; H Patrick McNeil
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.