Literature DB >> 18667657

The ethics of killing and letting die: active and passive euthanasia.

H V McLachlan1.   

Abstract

In their account of passive euthanasia, Garrard and Wilkinson present arguments that might lead one to overlook significant moral differences between killing and letting die. To kill is not the same as to let die. Similarly, there are significant differences between active and passive euthanasia. Our moral duties differ with regard to them. We are, in general, obliged to refrain from killing each and everyone. We do not have a similar obligation to try (or to continue to try) to prevent each and everyone from dying. In any case, to be morally obliged to persist in trying to prevent their deaths would be different from being morally obliged to refrain from killing all other people even if we had both obligations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18667657     DOI: 10.1136/jme.2007.023382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  3 in total

Review 1.  Religious, Ethical and Legal Considerations in End-of-Life Issues: Fundamental Requisites for Medical Decision Making.

Authors:  Puteri Nemie Jahn Kassim; Fadhlina Alias
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2016-02

2.  End-of-life discontinuation of destination therapy with cardiac and ventilatory support medical devices: physician-assisted death or allowing the patient to die?

Authors:  Mohamed Y Rady; Joseph L Verheijde
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 3.  Determinants of acceptance of end-of-life interventions: a comparison between withdrawing life-prolonging treatment and euthanasia in Austria.

Authors:  Erwin Stolz; Franziska Großschädl; Hannes Mayerl; Éva Rásky; Wolfgang Freidl
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.652

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.