Literature DB >> 18666370

The applications of biomarkers in early clinical drug development to improve decision-making processes.

Jochen Kuhlmann1, Georg Wensing.   

Abstract

Selecting, evaluating and applying biomarkers in drug discovery and exploratory drug development do substantially shorten the time to reach a critical decision point. Biomarkers are most useful in the early phase of clinical development when measurement of clinical endpoints or true surrogates may be too time-consuming or cumbersome to provide timely proof of principle or dose-ranging information. The use of biomarkers in early drug development helps to streamline clinical development by determining whether the drug is reaching and affecting the molecular target in humans, delivering findings that are comparable to preclinical data, and by providing a measurable endpoint that predicts desired or undesired clinical effects. Critical decisions such as candidate selection, early proof of mechanism or proof of concept, dose ranging and patient stratification as well as the assessment of development risks regarding safety, toxicity and drug interactions can be based on measurement of appropriate biomarkers that are biologically and/or clinically validated. Preclinical and phase I development plans can be focused to support an early s.d. or m.d. biomarker study in healthy volunteers or mildly diseased patients, thus saving both resources and time. Dose estimates and patient stratification may reduce the size and duration of clinical studies in later phases of development, and safety and toxicity biomarkers may help to stop or continue a programme early on. Even if a biomarker fails in the validation process there may still be a benefit of having used it as more knowledge about pathophysiology of the disease and the drug may be obtained. Thus, appropriateness of biomarkers depends on the stage of development, development strategy and the medical indication. Examples of biomarkers in exploratory clinical development are given for the development of new drugs in various indications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 18666370     DOI: 10.2174/157488406776872578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 1574-8847


  12 in total

Review 1.  Integrated pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in drug development.

Authors:  Jasper Dingemanse; Silke Appel-Dingemanse
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Discovering the Neural Nature of Moral Cognition? Empirical, Theoretical, and Practical Challenges in Bioethical Research with Electroencephalography (EEG).

Authors:  Nils-Frederic Wagner; Pedro Chaves; Annemarie Wolff
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  Development and application of a biomarker assay for determining the pharmacodynamic activity of an antagonist candidate biotherapeutic antibody to IL21R in whole blood.

Authors:  Maya Arai; Sadhana Jain; Amy A Weaver; Andrew A Hill; Yongjing Guo; Andrea G Bree; Michael F Smith; Scott W Allen; Edward R LaVallie; Deborah Young; Laird Bloom; Karissa Adkins; Margot O'Toole
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 5.531

4.  Pupillography as a sensitive, noninvasive biomarker in healthy volunteers: first-in-man study of BAY 63-9044, a new 5-HT1A-receptor agonist with dopamine agonistic properties.

Authors:  Georg Wensing; Claus Haase; Erich Brendel; Michael Friedrich Böttcher
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Effect of Neurexan on the pattern of EEG frequencies in rats.

Authors:  Wilfried Dimpfel; Kerstin Roeska; Bernd Seilheimer
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 3.659

6.  A novel method for the in vivo isolation of circulating tumor cells from peripheral blood of cancer patients using a functionalized and structured medical wire.

Authors:  Nadia Saucedo-Zeni; Steffi Mewes; Robert Niestroj; Lukasz Gasiorowski; David Murawa; Piotr Nowaczyk; Tatiana Tomasi; Ekkehard Weber; Grzegorz Dworacki; Nils G Morgenthaler; Heike Jansen; Corinna Propping; Karolina Sterzynska; Wojciech Dyszkiewicz; Maciej Zabel; Marion Kiechle; Ute Reuning; Manfred Schmitt; Klaus Lücke
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 5.650

7.  Literature mining for the discovery of hidden connections between drugs, genes and diseases.

Authors:  Raoul Frijters; Marianne van Vugt; Ruben Smeets; René van Schaik; Jacob de Vlieg; Wynand Alkema
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Pharmacodynamic Effects of an Angiotensin II Receptor-Antagonist in Phase I-Comparison between Healthy Subjects and Patients with Hypertension.

Authors:  Georg Wensing; Klaus Ochmann; Michael Boettcher; Anja Schäfer; Jochen Kuhlmann
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2007-03-22

9.  In situ mass spectrometry imaging and ex vivo characterization of renal crystalline deposits induced in multiple preclinical drug toxicology studies.

Authors:  Anna Nilsson; Benita Forngren; Sivert Bjurström; Richard J A Goodwin; Elisa Basmaci; Ingela Gustafsson; Anita Annas; Dennis Hellgren; Alexander Svanhagen; Per E Andrén; Johan Lindberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Circulating tumor cells, enumeration and beyond.

Authors:  Jian-Mei Hou; Matthew Krebs; Tim Ward; Karen Morris; Robert Sloane; Fiona Blackhall; Caroline Dive
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.