Literature DB >> 18666329

Effect of antidepressants on body weight, ethology and tumor growth of human pancreatic carcinoma xenografts in nude mice.

Lin Jia1, Yuan-Yuan Shang, Yu-Yuan Li.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the effects of mirtazapine and fluoxetine, representatives of the noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant (NaSSA) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressant respectively, on body weight, ingestive behavior, locomotor activity and tumor growth of human pancreatic carcinoma xenografts in nude mice.
METHODS: A subcutaneous xenograft model of human pancreatic cancer cell line SW1990 was established in nude mice. The tumor-bearing mice were randomly divided into mirtazapine group (10 mg/kg per day), fluoxetine group (10 mg/kg per day) and control group (an equivalent normal saline solution) (7 mice in each group). Doses of all drugs were administered orally, once a day for 42 d. Tumor volume and body weight were measured biweekly. Food intake was recorded once a week. Locomotor activity was detected weekly using an open field test (OFT).
RESULTS: Compared to the fluoxetine, mirtazapine significantly increased food intake from d 14 to 42 and attenuated the rate of weight loss from d 28 to 42 (t = 4.38, P < 0.05). Compared to the control group, food intake was significantly suppressed from d 21 to 42 and weight loss was promoted from d 35 to 42 in the fluoxetine group (t = 2.52, P < 0.05). There was a significant difference in body weight of the mice after removal of tumors among the three groups. The body weight of mice was the heaviest (13.66 +/- 1.55 g) in the mirtazapine group and the lightest (11.39 +/- 1.45 g) in the fluoxetine group (F( (2,12) ) = 11.43, P < 0.01). The behavioral test on d 7 showed that the horizontal and vertical activities were significantly increased in the mirtazapine group compared with the fluoxetine and control groups (F( (2,18) ) = 10.89, P < 0.01). These effects disappeared in the mirtazapine and fluoxetine groups during 2-6 wk. The grooming activity was higher in the mirtazapine group than in the fluoxetine group (10.1 +/- 2.1 vs 7.1 +/- 1.9 ) (t = 2.40, P < 0.05) in the second week. There was no significant difference in tumor volume and tumor weight of the three groups.
CONCLUSION: Mirtazapine and fluoxetine have no effect on the growth of pancreatic tumor. However, mirtazapine can significantly increase food intake and improve nutrition compared with fluoxetine in a pancreatic cancer mouse model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18666329      PMCID: PMC2731192          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.14.4377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  30 in total

1.  Mirtazapine for the treatment of depression and nausea in breast and gynecological oncology.

Authors:  D S Thompson
Journal:  Psychosomatics       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.386

2.  Fluoxetine decreases fat and protein intakes but not carbohydrate intake in male rats.

Authors:  L K Heisler; R B Kanarek; A Gerstein
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.533

3.  Effect of fluoxetine on food intake of humans living in a residential laboratory.

Authors:  R W Foltin; M Haney; S D Comer; M W Fischman
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 4.  Treatment of unintentional weight loss in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Todd W Mattox
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.080

5.  An open-label, crossover trial of mirtazapine (15 and 30 mg) in cancer patients with pain and other distressing symptoms.

Authors:  Dale E Theobald; Kenneth L Kirsh; Elizabeth Holtsclaw; Kathleen Donaghy; Steven D Passik
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 6.  Mirtazapine: a review of its use in major depression.

Authors:  K J Holm; A Markham
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Fluoxetine-maintained obese humans: effect on food intake and body weight.

Authors:  A S Ward; S D Comer; M Haney; M W Fischman; R W Foltin
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1999-07

8.  Antiangiogenic therapy for human pancreatic carcinoma xenografts in nude mice.

Authors:  Lin Jia; Mei-Hua Zhang; Shi-Zhen Yuan; Wen-Ge Huang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Reduction of fat and protein intakes but not carbohydrate intake following acute and chronic fluoxetine in female rats.

Authors:  L K Heisler; R B Kanarek; B Homoleski
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.533

10.  Growth-inhibitory effects of serotonin uptake inhibitors on human prostate carcinoma cell lines.

Authors:  M Abdul; C J Logothetis; N M Hoosein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  7 in total

1.  Intervention of mirtazapine on gemcitabine-induced mild cachexia in nude mice with pancreatic carcinoma xenografts.

Authors:  Shu-Man Jiang; Jian-Hua Wu; Lin Jia
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Antidepressants and breast and ovarian cancer risk: a review of the literature and researchers' financial associations with industry.

Authors:  Lisa Cosgrove; Ling Shi; David E Creasey; Maria Anaya-McKivergan; Jessica A Myers; Krista F Huybrechts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Antidepressant fluoxetine and its potential against colon tumors.

Authors:  Helga Stopper; Sergio Britto Garcia; Ana Maria Waaga-Gasser; Vinicius Kannen
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-01-15

4.  Fluoxetine counteracts the cognitive and cellular effects of 5-fluorouracil in the rat hippocampus by a mechanism of prevention rather than recovery.

Authors:  Laura Lyons; Maha ElBeltagy; Geoffrey Bennett; Peter Wigmore
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A comprehensive metabolomics investigation of hippocampus, serum, and feces affected by chronic fluoxetine treatment using the chronic unpredictable mild stress mouse model of depression.

Authors:  Jing Zhao; Yang-Hee Jung; Yan Jin; Seulgi Kang; Choon-Gon Jang; Jeongmi Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Immunomodulation Mechanism of Antidepressants: Interactions between Serotonin/Norepinephrine Balance and Th1/Th2 Balance.

Authors:  Matteo Martino; Giulio Rocchi; Andrea Escelsior; Michele Fornaro
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 7.363

7.  Antiproliferative effects of fluoxetine on colon cancer cells and in a colonic carcinogen mouse model.

Authors:  Vinicius Kannen; Henning Hintzsche; Dalila L Zanette; Wilson A Silva; Sérgio B Garcia; Ana Maria Waaga-Gasser; Helga Stopper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.