Literature DB >> 18666213

Agent Orange exposure, Vietnam War veterans, and the risk of prostate cancer.

Karim Chamie1, Ralph W DeVere White, Dennis Lee, Joon-Ha Ok, Lars M Ellison.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It has been demonstrated that Agent Orange exposure increases the risk of developing several soft tissue malignancies. Federally funded studies, now nearly a decade old, indicated that there was only a weak association between exposure and the subsequent development of prostate cancer. Because Vietnam War veterans are now entering their 60s, the authors reexamined this association by measuring the relative risk of prostate cancer among a cohort of men who were stratified as either exposed or unexposed to Agent Orange between the years 1962 and 1971 and who were followed during the interval between 1998 and 2006.
METHODS: All Vietnam War era veterans who receive their care in the Northern California Veteran Affairs Health System were stratified as either exposed (n=6214) or unexposed (n=6930) to Agent Orange. Strata-specific incidence rates of prostate cancer (International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision code 185.0) were calculated. Differences in patient and disease characteristics (age, race, smoking history, family history, body mass index, finasteride exposure, prebiopsy prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, clinical and pathologic stage, and Gleason score) were assessed with chi-square tests, t tests, a Cox proportional hazards model, and multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS: Twice as many exposed men were identified with prostate cancer (239 vs 124 unexposed men, respectively; odds ratio [OR], 2.19; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.75-2.75). This increased risk also was observed in a Cox proportional hazards model from the time of exposure to diagnosis (hazards ratio [HR], 2.87; 95% CI, 2.31-3.57). The mean time from exposure to diagnosis was 407 months. Agent Orange-exposed men were diagnosed at a younger age (59.7 years; 95% CI, 58.9-60.5 years) compared with unexposed men (62.2 years; 95% CI, 60.8-63.6 years), had a 2-fold increase in the proportion of Gleason scores 8 through 10 (21.8%; 95% CI, 16.5%-27%) compared with unexposed men (10.5%; 95% CI, 5%-15.9%), and were more likely to have metastatic disease at presentation than men who were not exposed (13.4%; 95% CI, 9%-17.7%) than unexposed men (4%; 95% CI, 0.5%-7.5%). In univariate analysis, distribution by race, smoking history, body mass index, finasteride exposure, clinical stage, and mean prebiopsy PSA were not statistically different. In a multivariate logistic regression model, Agent Orange was the most important predictor not only of developing prostate cancer but also of high-grade and metastatic disease on presentation.
CONCLUSIONS: Individuals who were exposed to Agent Orange had an increased incidence of prostate cancer; developed the disease at a younger age, and had a more aggressive variant than their unexposed counterparts. Consideration should be made to classify this group of individuals as 'high risk,' just like men of African-American heritage and men with a family history of prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18666213     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  23 in total

1.  A novel prostate cancer therapeutic strategy using icaritin-activated arylhydrocarbon-receptor to co-target androgen receptor and its splice variants.

Authors:  Feng Sun; Inthrani R Indran; Zhi Wei Zhang; M H Eileen Tan; Yu Li; Z L Ryan Lim; Rui Hua; Chong Yang; Fen-Fen Soon; Jun Li; H Eric Xu; Edwin Cheung; Eu-Leong Yong
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 4.944

2.  The case for postmortem imaging.

Authors:  H Theodore Harcke
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-12-16

Review 3.  A critical review of the epidemiology of Agent Orange/TCDD and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ellen T Chang; Paolo Boffetta; Hans-Olov Adami; Philip Cole; Jack S Mandel
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-07-27       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 4.  Potential protective mechanisms of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) signaling in benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Vatsal Mehta; Chad M Vezina
Journal:  Differentiation       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.880

5.  Influence of dioxin exposure upon levels of prostate-specific antigen and steroid hormones in Vietnamese men.

Authors:  Xian Liang Sun; Teruhiko Kido; Seijiro Honma; Rie Okamoto; Ho Dung Manh; Shoko Maruzeni; Muneko Nishijo; Hideaki Nakagawa; Takeshi Nakano; Eitetsu Koh; Takumi Takasuga; Dang Duc Nhu; Nguyen Ngoc Hung; Le Ke Son
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  What men want: Qualitative analysis of what men with prostate cancer (PCa) want to learn regarding genetic referral, counseling, and testing.

Authors:  Samantha Greenberg; Stacey Slager; Brock O' Neil; Kathleen Cooney; Benjamin Maughan; Nicole Stopa; Vickie Venne; Susan Zickmund; Sarah Colonna
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 4.104

7.  The relationship between Agent Orange and prostate specific antigen: a comparison of a hotspot and a non-sprayed area in Vietnam.

Authors:  Xianliang Sun; Teruhiko Kido; Rie Okamoto; Ho Dung Manh; Nguyen Viet Hoang; Madoca Nakano; Eitetus Koh; Shoko Maruzeni; Muneko Nishijo; Hideaki Nakagawa; Hiroyuki Suzuki; Sejiro Honma; Dang Duc Nhu; Nguyen Ngoc Hung; Le Ke Son
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 3.674

8.  Plasma organochlorines and subsequent risk of prostate cancer in Japanese men: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Norie Sawada; Motoki Iwasaki; Manami Inoue; Hiroaki Itoh; Shizuka Sasazuki; Taiki Yamaji; Taichi Shimazu; Shoichiro Tsugane
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Agent Orange as a risk factor for high-grade prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nathan Ansbaugh; Jackilen Shannon; Motomi Mori; Paige E Farris; Mark Garzotto
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  A clash of old and new scientific concepts in toxicity, with important implications for public health.

Authors:  John Peterson Myers; R Thomas Zoeller; Frederick S vom Saal
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.