BACKGROUND: Sources of cancer-related information are rapidly increasing, but little is known about whether the health information available to cancer survivors meets their needs. METHODS: The authors surveyed 778 Massachusetts cancer survivors 3, 6, or 11 years after their diagnosis for 6 common cancers. They analyzed their views about 5 types of cancer-related information, the quality of that information, barriers to getting it, their experiences with physicians providing cancer care, and the quality of their cancer care. RESULTS: Among 462 (61%) respondents who reported needing cancer information, many gave unfavorable ratings (fair or poor) of the quality of cancer information regarding cancer support groups (38%), long-term side effects (36%), experiences of other cancer patients (26%), and cancer physicians (26%). About 20% of respondents reported sometimes experiencing barriers to obtaining cancer information, although fewer than 10% usually or always experienced barriers. For both men and women, worse physical and mental functioning was associated with greater need for information, worse ratings of information quality, and more barriers to obtaining information (all P<.01). Cancer survivors who were black or had lower incomes reported more problems obtaining needed information, and younger women had greater information needs than older women (all P <.01). CONCLUSIONS: Opportunities exist to improve the quality, content and delivery of cancer-related information to survivors, especially for those who are racial/ethnic minorities, have low incomes, or are in worse physical or mental health. Providing information more effectively to cancer survivors may improve their care and health outcomes. (c) 2008 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: Sources of cancer-related information are rapidly increasing, but little is known about whether the health information available to cancer survivors meets their needs. METHODS: The authors surveyed 778 Massachusetts cancer survivors 3, 6, or 11 years after their diagnosis for 6 common cancers. They analyzed their views about 5 types of cancer-related information, the quality of that information, barriers to getting it, their experiences with physicians providing cancer care, and the quality of their cancer care. RESULTS: Among 462 (61%) respondents who reported needing cancer information, many gave unfavorable ratings (fair or poor) of the quality of cancer information regarding cancer support groups (38%), long-term side effects (36%), experiences of other cancerpatients (26%), and cancer physicians (26%). About 20% of respondents reported sometimes experiencing barriers to obtaining cancer information, although fewer than 10% usually or always experienced barriers. For both men and women, worse physical and mental functioning was associated with greater need for information, worse ratings of information quality, and more barriers to obtaining information (all P<.01). Cancer survivors who were black or had lower incomes reported more problems obtaining needed information, and younger women had greater information needs than older women (all P <.01). CONCLUSIONS: Opportunities exist to improve the quality, content and delivery of cancer-related information to survivors, especially for those who are racial/ethnic minorities, have low incomes, or are in worse physical or mental health. Providing information more effectively to cancer survivors may improve their care and health outcomes. (c) 2008 American Cancer Society.
Authors: Marilyn M Schapira; Kathlyn E Fletcher; Pamela S Ganschow; Elizabeth A Jacobs; Cindy M Walker; Alicia J Smallwood; Denisse Gil; Arshia Faghri; Amanda L Kong; Tina W Yen; Susan McDunn; Elizabeth Marcus; Joan M Neuner Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2019-06-25 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Charles L Shapiro; Mary S McCabe; Karen L Syrjala; Debra Friedman; Linda A Jacobs; Patricia A Ganz; Lisa Diller; Marci Campell; Kathryn Orcena; Alfred C Marcus Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2009-01-24 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Tinuke O Olagunju; Yihang Liu; Li-Jung Liang; James M Stomber; Jennifer J Griggs; Patricia A Ganz; Amardeep Thind; Rose C Maly Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-04-06 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: M Tish Knobf; Leah M Ferrucci; Brenda Cartmel; Beth A Jones; Denise Stevens; Maureen Smith; Andrew Salner; Linda Mowad Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2011-10-09 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Jennifer K Bernat; Daniela A Wittman; Sarah T Hawley; Daniel A Hamstra; Alexander M Helfand; David A Haggstrom; May Darwish-Yassine; Ted A Skolarus Journal: BJU Int Date: 2015-10-26 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Michelle Y Martin; Mary B Evans; Polly Kratt; Lori A Pollack; Judith Lee Smith; Robert Oster; Mark Dignan; Heather Prayor-Patterson; Christopher Watson; Peter Houston; Shiquina Andrews; Amandiy Liwo; Tung Sung Tseng; Sandral Hullett; Joann Oliver; Maria Pisu Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2014-01-16
Authors: Matthew P Banegas; John F Dickerson; Erin E Kent; Janet S de Moor; Katherine S Virgo; Gery P Guy; Donatus U Ekwueme; Zhiyuan Zheng; Stephanie Nutt; Loyce Pace; Alexandra Varga; Lisa Waiwaiole; Jennifer Schneider; K Robin Yabroff Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Mary Playdon; Leah M Ferrucci; Ruth McCorkle; Kevin D Stein; Rachel Cannady; Tara Sanft; Brenda Cartmel Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2016-01-07 Impact factor: 4.442