Literature DB >> 18666144

Comparison of different contrast agents and doses for quantitative MR myocardial perfusion imaging.

Herbert Köstler1, Christian Ritter, Michael Lipp, Meinrad Beer, Dietbert Hahn, Jörn Sandstede.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate three different contrast agents at different injection volumes for repetitive quantitative multislice myocardial perfusion imaging using the prebolus technique.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two consecutive prebolus perfusion measurements were performed on a 1.5 T scanner using identical injection volumes for the first and second examination to test the reproducibility for possible rest and stress examination in normal volunteers. Either 1-8 mL, 1-12 mL Gd-DTPA, 1-4 mL, 1-6 mL, 1-9 mL Gd-BOPTA, or 1-4 mL, 1-6 mL gadobutrol were applied.
RESULTS: In cases where injection volumes were sufficiently small, there was no indication of significant differences in quantitative perfusion values with respect to the different contrast agents. Increasing the bolus volume improved the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) but led to saturation effects and underestimation of the true perfusion. The highest CNR was measured for gadobutrol (6 mL, p < 0.0005 compared to 8 mL Gd-DTPA). The smallest difference of perfusion values between the first and the second prebolus examination was found for Gd-BOPTA (p < or = 0.006 compared Gd-DTPA).
CONCLUSION: Prebolus examinations for quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging are possible with all three contrast agents for sufficient small injection volumes. Gd-BOPTA was found to be advantageous for a combined quantitative rest and stress examination. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18666144     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  6 in total

1.  Free-breathing cardiac MR stress perfusion with real-time slice tracking.

Authors:  Tamer A Basha; Sébastien Roujol; Kraig V Kissinger; Beth Goddu; Sophie Berg; Warren J Manning; Reza Nezafat
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  Coronary microvascular dysfunction: mechanisms and functional assessment.

Authors:  Paolo G Camici; Giulia d'Amati; Ornella Rimoldi
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Quantification of myocardial perfusion using CMR with a radial data acquisition: comparison with a dual-bolus method.

Authors:  Tae Ho Kim; Nathan A Pack; Liyong Chen; Edward V R DiBella
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 5.364

4.  Effect of short-term smoking & L-arginine on coronary endothelial function assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance cold pressor testing: a pilot study.

Authors:  Andreas M Weng; Herbert Köstler; Thorsten A Bley; Christian O Ritter
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 2.298

5.  DCE-MRI of the liver: reconstruction of the arterial input function using a low dose pre-bolus contrast injection.

Authors:  Guido H Jajamovich; Claudia Calcagno; Hadrien A Dyvorne; Henry Rusinek; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A spatially-distributed computational model to quantify behaviour of contrast agents in MR perfusion imaging.

Authors:  A N Cookson; J Lee; C Michler; R Chabiniok; E Hyde; D Nordsletten; N P Smith
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 8.545

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.