Literature DB >> 18665733

Are attractive men's faces masculine or feminine? The importance of type of facial stimuli.

Jennifer L Rennels1, P Matthew Bronstad, Judith H Langlois.   

Abstract

The authors investigated whether differences in facial stimuli could explain the inconsistencies in the facial attractiveness literature regarding whether adults prefer more masculine- or more feminine-looking male faces. Their results demonstrated that use of a female average to dimorphically transform a male facial average produced stimuli that did not accurately reflect the relationship between masculinity and attractiveness. In contrast, use of averages of masculine males and averages of feminine males produced stimuli that did accurately reflect the relationship between masculinity and attractiveness. Their findings suggest that masculinity contributes more to male facial attractiveness than does femininity, but future research should investigate how various combinations of facial cues contribute to male facial attractiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18665733     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.4.884

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  13 in total

1.  Influences of observer sex, facial masculinity, and gender role identification on first impressions of men's faces.

Authors:  Kathryn R Macapagal; Heather A Rupp; Julia R Heiman
Journal:  J Soc Evol Cult Psychol       Date:  2011-01

2.  Beauty is in the ease of the beholding: a neurophysiological test of the averageness theory of facial attractiveness.

Authors:  Logan T Trujillo; Jessica M Jankowitsch; Judith H Langlois
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Does masculinity matter? The contribution of masculine face shape to male attractiveness in humans.

Authors:  Isabel M L Scott; Nicholas Pound; Ian D Stephen; Andrew P Clark; Ian S Penton-Voak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Differences in Expressivity Based on Attractiveness: Target or Perceiver Effects?

Authors:  Jennifer L Rennels; Andrea J Kayl
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2015-09-01

5.  The motivational salience of infant faces is similar for men and women.

Authors:  Christine E Parsons; Katherine S Young; Nina Kumari; Alan Stein; Morten L Kringelbach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Natural variation in female reproductive hormones does not affect contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  Abigail L M Webb; Paul B Hibbard; Rick O'Gorman
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  A comparison between 2D and 3D methods of quantifying facial morphology.

Authors:  I Y Anas; B O Bamgbose; Saleh Nuhu
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-06-14

8.  Do men's faces really signal heritable immunocompetence?

Authors:  Isabel M L Scott; Andrew P Clark; Lynda G Boothroyd; Ian S Penton-Voak
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.671

9.  The Effect of Target Sex, Sexual Dimorphism, and Facial Attractiveness on Perceptions of Target Attractiveness and Trustworthiness.

Authors:  Yuanyan Hu; Najam Ul Hasan Abbasi; Yang Zhang; Hong Chen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-06-08

10.  Physical attractiveness and sex as modulatory factors of empathic brain responses to pain.

Authors:  Kamila Jankowiak-Siuda; Krystyna Rymarczyk; Łukasz Żurawski; Katarzyna Jednoróg; Artur Marchewka
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 3.617

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.